Sutton v. Shasta Industries Incorporated
SAMUEL J. SUTTON, JR. |
SHASTA INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED |
21-2314 |
September 15, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
SUTTON v. SHASTA INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 APPENDIX FILED by Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated. Service: 11/10/2021 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [811685] [21-2314] [Timothy Berg] [Entered: 11/10/2021 07:37 PM] |
Filing 12 RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated. Service: 11/10/2021 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [811683] [21-2314] [Timothy Berg] [Entered: 11/10/2021 07:35 PM] |
Filing 11 Amended Entry of appearance for Brett C. Gilmore; Lindsey Maasch as counsel for. Service: 11/09/2021 by email. [811361] [21-2314] [Brett Gilmore] [Entered: 11/09/2021 06:51 PM] |
Filing 10 Entry of appearance for Timothy J. Berg as counsel for Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated. Service: 10/25/2021 by email. [807964] [21-2314] [Timothy Berg] [Entered: 10/25/2021 01:34 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated, Entry of Appearance [ # 7 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/01/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [807835] [JCW] [Entered: 10/25/2021 08:34 AM] |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated. Service: 10/21/2021 by email. [807410] [21-2314] [Timothy Berg] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:53 PM] |
Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Timothy J. Berg; Todd Kartchner; Brett C. Gilmore; Lyndsey Maasch as counsel for Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated. Service: 10/21/2021 by email. [807407] [21-2314] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Timothy Berg] [Entered: 10/21/2021 04:52 PM] |
Filing 6 Notice to Appellee Shasta Industries Incorporated: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b), Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Please file promptly . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [806520] [MMA] [Entered: 10/18/2021 04:08 PM] |
Filing 5 MODIFIED ENTRY: INFORMAL BRIEF FILED with APPENDIX by Appellant Samuel J. Sutton, Jr. Service: 10/01/2021 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [803214]--[Edited 10/18/2021 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Samuel Sutton] [Entered: 10/01/2021 08:03 PM] |
Filing 4 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Samuel J. Sutton, Jr.. Service: 09/29/2021 by email. [802719] [21-2314] [Samuel Sutton] [Entered: 09/29/2021 09:36 PM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Samuel J. Sutton, Jr., Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 10/06/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [802703] [MMA] [Entered: 09/29/2021 05:35 PM] |
Filing 2 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Samuel J. Sutton, Jr.. Service: 09/29/2021 by email. [802586] [21-2314] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 3 ] [Samuel Sutton] [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:29 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/13/2021. [799632] Entry of Appearance due 09/29/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/29/2021. Appellant/Petitioner's Informal brief is due 10/06/2021. [MMA] [Entered: 09/15/2021 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.