Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOE A. SALAZAR
Defendant / Appellee: AT&T MOBILITY LLC, SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, T-MOBILE USA, INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP INC., dba Verizon Wireless, Inc., HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 21-2320
Filed: September 16, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 5, 2023 Summary Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC

RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Petition for writ of certiorari filed on 09/06/2023 in the U.S. Supreme Court. No.: 23-241, Joe A. Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC. [950108]--[Edited 09/14/2023 by MJL to correct filed date] [MJL] [Entered: 09/14/2023 04:03 PM]
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 53 Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [930305] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 06/15/2023 11:36 AM]
June 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER filed denying [ # 50 ] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Joe A. Salazar. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [928708] [MVH] [Entered: 06/08/2023 01:52 PM]
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 51 13 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 50 ] received from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. [924313] [VDW] [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:41 AM]
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 50 Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 05/05/2023 by email. [921594] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:28 PM]
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 49 JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: No Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click # here . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [914570] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:25 AM]
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION filed for the court by Stoll, Circuit Judge; Schall, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [914569] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:24 AM]
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Stoll, Circuit Judge; Schall, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge. Arguing counsel: Mr. Dariush Keyhani for Joe A. Salazar and Mr. Todd Eric Landis for AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Cellco Partnership Inc. and Sprint United Management Company. Oral Argument Audio available # here . [882571] [JCP] [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:12 PM]
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Clerk's Note to the File: The oral argument scheduled for 11/07/2022 will now take place in Courtroom 201. [880460] [MJL] [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:10 PM]
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 10/05/2022 by email. [876159] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 10/05/2022 03:10 PM]
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 Response to notice of oral argument from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Service: 10/05/2022 by email. [876140] [21-2320] [Todd Landis] [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:33 PM]
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2211L. Case scheduled November 7, 2022. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 10/05/2022. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found # here . The Oral Argument Guide can be found # here . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [873188] [MVH] [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:01 PM]
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 The following conflict dates submitted by Todd Eric Landis for AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. have been accepted by the court: 10/03/2022, 10/04/2022, 10/05/2022, 10/06/2022, 10/07/2022, 11/01/2022, 11/02/2022, 11/03/2022, 11/04/2022. [865832] [MJL] [Entered: 08/10/2022 09:33 AM]
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Notice from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 08/09/2022 by email. [865709] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 08/09/2022 12:42 PM]
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Notice from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/13/2022 by email. [855229] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 06/13/2022 01:50 PM]
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 32 ], [ # 19 ] received from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. [855458] [VDW] [Entered: 06/14/2022 11:38 AM]
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 34 ], [ # 25 ], [ # 11 ] received from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. [854491] [VDW] [Entered: 06/08/2022 05:11 PM]
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found # here . The Oral Argument Guide can be found # here . [853611] [JCW] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:50 AM]
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [853610] [JCW] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:49 AM]
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER filed denying [ # 28 ] motion to dismiss the cross-appeal, ECF No. 28; granting motion to modify the official caption [ # 23 ], ECF No. 23, only to the extent that the revised official caption is reflected above. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [852678] [LMS] [Entered: 05/31/2022 11:54 AM]
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MODIFIED ENTRY: CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 05/03/2022 by email. [847269]--[Edited 05/04/2022 by JCW - compliance review complete] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 05/03/2022 03:56 PM]
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 05/03/2022 by email. [847266] --[Edited 05/04/2022 by JCW - compliance review complete] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 05/03/2022 03:52 PM]
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Service: 04/26/2022 by email. [845550] --[Edited 04/26/2022 by JCW - compliance review complete] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 04/26/2022 04:01 PM]
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 REPLY of Appellant Joe A. Salazar to response [ # 30 ]. Service: 04/22/2022 by email. [845066] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:17 PM]
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 RESPONSE of Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation to Doc No. [ # 28 ]. Service: 04/15/2022 by email. [843642] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 04/15/2022 05:09 PM]
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 RESPONSE of Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation to Doc No. [ # 23 ]. Service: 04/08/2022 by email. [842162] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 04/08/2022 04:38 PM]
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MOTION of Appellant Joe A. Salazar to terminate appeal through Dismissal of Cross-Appeal. Cases to be terminated: 2021-2376. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion). Service: 04/06/2022 by email. [841356] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 04/06/2022 12:30 PM]
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellant Joe A. Salazar, Motions to Dismiss Cross-Appeal [ # 24 ], [ # 26 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents are due on 04/13/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [841261] [EKD] [Entered: 04/06/2022 08:49 AM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MOTION of Appellant Joe A. Salazar Plaintiff-Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Cross-Appeal. Service: 04/05/2022 by email. [841241] [21-2320] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 27 ] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 04/05/2022 09:31 PM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 04/05/2022 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [841233] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 04/05/2022 07:59 PM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MOTION of Appellant Joe A. Salazar to voluntarily dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Service: 04/05/2022 by email. [841232] [21-2320] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 27 ] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 04/05/2022 07:58 PM]
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION of Appellant Joe A. Salazar to modify the official caption. Service: 03/29/2022 by email. [839811] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 03/29/2022 06:55 PM]
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER filed granting motion [ # 14 ] to the extent that the parties may include the documents in the joint appendix and may cite the documents in the briefs. The relevance of these materials, however, is left to the merits panel assigned to this case. The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [839412] [LMS] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:22 PM]
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 20 ] filed by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. The reply brief is due 04/18/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [836239] [JCW] [Entered: 03/11/2022 08:39 AM]
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION of Appellant Joe A. Salazar to extend the time to 04/18/2022 to file brief. Service: 03/10/2022 by email. [836206] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 03/10/2022 06:05 PM]
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellees HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation and Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Service: 03/09/2022 by email. [835905] --[Edited 03/09/2022 by JCW - compliance review complete] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 03/09/2022 04:26 PM]
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation and Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Corrected Response Brief [ # 17 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/11/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [834808] [JCW] [Entered: 03/04/2022 09:11 AM]
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation. Service: 03/03/2022 by email. [834751] [21-2320] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 18 ] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 03/03/2022 05:32 PM]
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation and Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Response Brief [ # 15 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/04/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [833434] [JCW] [Entered: 02/25/2022 08:19 AM]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation. Service: 02/24/2022 by email. [833422] [21-2320] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 16 ] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 02/24/2022 05:10 PM]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION of Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation to waive appendix requirement(s). Service: 02/24/2022 by email. [833420] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 02/24/2022 05:07 PM]
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation. The response brief is due 02/24/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [815242] [JCW] [Entered: 11/30/2021 08:54 AM]
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION of Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation to extend the time to 02/24/2022 to file brief. Service: 11/29/2021 by email. [815168] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 11/29/2021 06:36 PM]
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 11/15/2021 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [812469] --[Edited 11/16/2021 by JCW -compliance review complete] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 11/15/2021 05:01 PM]
October 1, 2021 Filing 10 Official caption revised to reflect appearance of HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [803013] [JCW] [Entered: 10/01/2021 08:43 AM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Appellees HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802988] [21-2320] --[Edited 10/08/2021 by CAB to add party filers] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 09/30/2021 09:15 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802986] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 09/30/2021 09:14 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Fred I. Williams; Todd E. Landis; John Wittenzellner as counsel for Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802985] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 09/30/2021 09:13 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802958] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 09/30/2021 05:16 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Dariush Keyhani as counsel for Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802956] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 09/30/2021 05:14 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 09/30/2021 by email. [802955] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 09/30/2021 05:12 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 Official caption revised to relect cross-appeal with 21-2376. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [802857] [JCW] [Entered: 09/30/2021 01:36 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 2 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 21-2320 Lead with 21-2376 Cross-Appeal. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [802853] [21-2320, 21-2376] [JCW] [Entered: 09/30/2021 01:33 PM]
September 16, 2021 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/16/2021. [800009] Entry of Appearance is due on 09/30/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/30/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 09/30/2021. Appellant's brief is due on 11/15/2021. [JCW] [Entered: 09/16/2021 02:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOE A. SALAZAR
Represented By: Dariush Keyhani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Represented By: Fred Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Represented By: Fred Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Represented By: Fred Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP INC., dba Verizon Wireless, Inc.
Represented By: Fred Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HTC CORPORATION
Represented By: Fred Williams
Represented By: Todd Eric Landis
Represented By: John Wittenzellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HTC AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Fred Williams
Represented By: Todd Eric Landis
Represented By: John Wittenzellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?