Bailey-Johnson v. US
ERIKA BAILEY-JOHNSON |
UNITED STATES |
21-2351 |
September 27, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER filed granting motion for summary affirmance [ # 4 ] to the extent that the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is affirmed. Each side to bear its own costs. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [814400] [LMS] [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:50 AM] |
Filing 5 Transcript Purchase Order Form for the Appellant Erika Bailey-Johnson indicating that a request is made to the reporter for a transcript. Service: 10/27/2021 by clerk. [808616] [JCP] [Entered: 10/27/2021 04:42 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION of Appellant Erika Bailey-Johnson for summary affirmance. Cases to be terminated: Case Number 2021-2351. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion).. Service: 10/25/2021 by email. [807949] [21-2351] [Daniel Cragg] [Entered: 10/25/2021 12:46 PM] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Daniel J. Cragg; Vince C. Reuter as counsel for Appellant Erika Bailey-Johnson. Service: 10/12/2021 by email. [805062] [21-2351] [Daniel Cragg] [Entered: 10/12/2021 03:46 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Brian C. Toth as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 10/06/2021 by email. [803872] [21-2351] [Brian Toth] [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:45 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/21/2021. [801861] Entry of Appearance due 10/12/2021. Certificate of Interest due 10/12/2021. Docketing Statement due 10/27/2021. Appellant's brief due 11/26/2021. [KMH] [Entered: 09/27/2021 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.