Dionex Softron GmbH v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
| DIONEX SOFTRON GMBH |
| AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| 21-2372 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Dionex Softron GmbH v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/28/2021. [802604] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/13/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/13/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 10/13/2021. Certified List is due on 11/08/2021. [JCW] [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dionex Softron GmbH v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: DIONEX SOFTRON GMBH | |
| Represented By: | Andrew James Isbester |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Philip Mark Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
