Flexsteel Pipeline Technologies, Inc. v. Offshore Pipelines and Risers (OPR) Inc.
| FLEXSTEEL PIPELINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| OFFSHORE PIPELINES AND RISERS (OPR) INC., YONG BAI and QIANG BAI |
| OPR OFFSHORE ENGINEERING, CO., LTD |
| 22-1053 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Flexsteel Pipeline Technologies, Inc.. Service: 11/03/2021 by email. [810114] [22-1053] [Colin Phillips] [Entered: 11/03/2021 10:18 PM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of appearance for Sean N. Hsu; Rajkumar Vinnakota; Timothy J.H. Craddock as counsel for Cross-Appellants Offshore Pipelines And Risers (OPR) Inc., OPR Offshore Engineering, Co., Ltd and Yong Bai. Service: 11/03/2021 by email. [809909] [22-1053] [Sean Hsu] [Entered: 11/03/2021 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 10 Notice to Appellant Flexsteel Pipeline Technologies, Inc.: The record of this case indicates that no Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [809708] [JCW] [Entered: 11/02/2021 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Cross-Appellants Yong Bai, OPR Offshore Engineering, Co., Ltd and Offshore Pipelines And Risers (OPR) Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/05/2021. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [809207] [JCW] [Entered: 10/29/2021 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Flexsteel Pipeline Technologies, Inc.. Service: 10/28/2021 by email. [809025] [22-1053] [Colin Phillips] [Entered: 10/28/2021 10:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Kyung Kim; Colin Phillips as counsel for Appellant Flexsteel Pipeline Technologies, Inc.. Service: 10/28/2021 by email. [809016] [22-1053] [Colin Phillips] [Entered: 10/28/2021 07:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Cross-Appellants Yong Bai, Offshore Pipelines And Risers (OPR) Inc. and OPR Offshore Engineering, Co., Ltd. Service: 10/28/2021 by email. [808926] [22-1053] [Sean Hsu] [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Cross-Appellants Yong Bai, Offshore Pipelines And Risers (OPR) Inc. and OPR Offshore Engineering, Co., Ltd. Service: 10/28/2021 by email. [808925] [22-1053] [Sean Hsu] [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Sean N. Hsu; Rajkumar Vinnakota; Timothy J.H. Craddock as counsel for Cross-Appellants Offshore Pipelines And Risers (OPR) Inc., OPR Offshore Engineering, Co., Ltd and Yong Bai. Service: 10/28/2021 by email. [808924] [22-1053] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Sean Hsu] [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 22-1053 Lead with 22-1054 and 22-1055 Cross-Appeals. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [806945] [22-1053, 22-1054, 22-1055] [JCW] [Entered: 10/20/2021 08:51 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER consolidating appeals (22-1053, 22-1054, 22-1055). See order for additional information. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [806943] [22-1053, 22-1054, 22-1055] [JCW] [Entered: 10/20/2021 08:48 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/13/2021. [805622] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/28/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/28/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 10/28/2021. Appellant's brief is due on 12/13/2021. [JCW] [Entered: 10/14/2021 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
