Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC
| ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC |
| SHENZHEN ABSEN OPTOELECTRONIC CO., LTD. and ABSEN, INC. |
| 22-1098 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOVISION, LLC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC. The opening brief is due 03/04/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [818687] [JCW] [Entered: 12/15/2021 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC to extend the time to 03/04/2022 to file brief. Service: 12/14/2021 by email. [818664] [22-1098] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 12/14/2021 07:20 PM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Absen, Inc. and Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/19/2021 by email. [813776] [22-1098] [Kevin Martin] [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Absen, Inc. and Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/19/2021 by email. [813772] [22-1098] [Kevin Martin] [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Kevin Paul Martin; Naomi Birbach; Srikanth K. Reddy; Patrick McCarthy; Jordan Bock as counsel for Appellees Absen, Inc. and Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.. Service: 11/19/2021 by email. [813769] [22-1098] [Kevin Martin] [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC. Service: 11/19/2021 by email. [813648] [22-1098] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 6 Notice to Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC: The record of this case indicates that no Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [813629] [JCW] [Entered: 11/19/2021 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 Notice to Appellees Absen, Inc. and Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b), Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4, and/or Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [813628] [JCW] [Entered: 11/19/2021 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 Amended Entry of appearance for Alfred R. Fabricant; Peter Lambrianakos; Vincent J. Rubino, III; Joseph M. Mercadante as counsel for Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC. Service: 11/17/2021 by email. [813080] [22-1098] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 11/17/2021 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Alfred R. Fabricant; Peter Lambrianakos; Vincent J. Rubino, III as counsel for Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC. Service: 11/15/2021 by email. [812499] [22-1098] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 11/15/2021 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Ultravision Technologies, LLC. Service: 11/15/2021 by email. [812498] [22-1098] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 11/15/2021 06:05 PM] |
Filing 1
Appeal docketed. Received: 10/28/2021. [809331] Entry of Appearance is due on 11/15/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/15/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 11/15/2021. Appellant's brief is due on 01/03/2022. [JCW] [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:13 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
