Solas OLED Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLAS OLED LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 22-1185
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2022 Filing 12 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. The opening brief is due 03/25/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [823928] [JCW] [Entered: 01/11/2022 04:02 PM]
January 11, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION of Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. to extend the time to 03/25/2022 to file brief. Service: 01/11/2022 by email. [823920] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 01/11/2022 03:53 PM]
January 11, 2022 Filing 10 Entry of appearance for Richard L. Rainey as counsel for Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Service: 01/11/2022 by email. [823778] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 01/11/2022 11:49 AM]
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed. The appeals (2022-1013 and 2022-1185) shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [823226] [22-1013, 22-1185] [NL] [Entered: 01/07/2022 09:50 AM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Solas OLED Ltd.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817314] [22-1185] [Reza Mirzaie] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:55 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Solas OLED Ltd.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817313] [22-1185] [Reza Mirzaie] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:53 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Reza Mirzaie; Marc A. Fenster; Neil A. Rubin; James S. Tsuei; Jacob Buczko as counsel for Appellee Solas OLED Ltd.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817312] [22-1185] [Reza Mirzaie] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:51 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 Certificate of Service for Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817250] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:26 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817241] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:23 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817237] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:21 PM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Jeffrey H. Lerner; Robert T. Haslam; Robert A. Long as counsel for Appellants Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. Service: 12/08/2021 by email. [817234] [22-1185] [Jeffrey Lerner] [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:20 PM]
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/23/2021. [814658] Entry of Appearance is due on 12/08/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/08/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 12/08/2021. Appellants' brief is due on 01/24/2022. [JCW] [Entered: 11/24/2021 08:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Solas OLED Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: SOLAS OLED LTD.
Represented By: Jonas Bram Jacobson
Represented By: Reza Mirzaie
Represented By: Jacob Buczko
Represented By: Marc A. Fenster
Represented By: Adam Hoffman
Represented By: Neil Rubin
Represented By: James S. Tsuei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Represented By: Jeffrey Howard Lerner Esq.
Represented By: Robert Haslam
Represented By: Robert Allen Long Jr.
Represented By: Richard L. Rainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Represented By: Jeffrey Howard Lerner Esq.
Represented By: Robert Haslam
Represented By: Robert Allen Long Jr.
Represented By: Richard L. Rainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Jeffrey Howard Lerner Esq.
Represented By: Robert Haslam
Represented By: Robert Allen Long Jr.
Represented By: Richard L. Rainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?