SmithIn re: Smith
| In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH |
| ANGELA D. CAESAR, Clerk of Court |
| 22-119 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Franklin C. Smith for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 12/21/2021 by clerk. [820223] [EKD] [Entered: 12/21/2021 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 12/17/2021. [820219] Fee/IFP is due on 01/04/2022. Entry of Appearance is due on 01/04/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 12/21/2021 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: SmithIn re: Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Franklin C. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ANGELA D. CAESAR, Clerk of Court | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.