Doe v. Biden
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, in his official capacity and MARVIN G. RICHARDSON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Case Number: 22-1197
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 31, 2022 DOE v. BIDEN

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant John Doe to extend the time to 01/31/2022 to file brief, to extend the time to 01/31/2022 to file the appendix. Service: 01/26/2022 by email. [827242] [22-1197] [Thomas Maag] [Entered: 01/26/2022 08:55 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant John Doe, Opening Brief [ # 9 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 01/28/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [825980] [JCW] [Entered: 01/21/2022 12:26 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF FILED by John Doe. Service: 01/21/2022 by email. [825969] [22-1197] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 10 ] [Thomas Maag] [Entered: 01/21/2022 12:15 PM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Merrick B. Garland and Marvin G. Richardson. Service: 01/06/2022 by email. [823035] [22-1197] [Bradley Hinshelwood] [Entered: 01/06/2022 10:34 AM]
January 5, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Merrick B. Garland and Marvin G. Richardson: The record of this case indicates that no Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [822740] [JCW] [Entered: 01/05/2022 09:52 AM]
December 13, 2021 Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellant John Doe. Service: 12/13/2021 by email. [818359] [22-1197] [Thomas Maag] [Entered: 12/13/2021 09:15 PM]
December 13, 2021 Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellant John Doe. Service: 12/03/2021 by email. [818354] [22-1197] [Thomas Maag] [Entered: 12/13/2021 08:39 PM]
December 13, 2021 Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Thomas G. Maag as counsel for Appellant John Doe. Service: 12/13/2021 by email. [818315] [22-1197] [Thomas Maag] [Entered: 12/13/2021 05:41 PM]
December 2, 2021 Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Kyle T. Edwards; Abby C. Wright; Brad Hinshelwood; Mark B. Stern; Michael S. Raab as counsel for Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Merrick B. Garland and Marvin G. Richardson. Service: 12/02/2021 by email. [815891] [22-1197] [Kyle Edwards] [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:50 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Note to File: Appeal transferred from 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 21-2777. [815139] [JCW] [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:40 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/24/2021. [815135] Entry of Appearance is due on 12/13/2021. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/13/2021. Docketing Statement is due on 12/29/2021. Appellant's brief is due on 01/28/2022. [JCW] [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Doe v. Biden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Represented By: Thomas G. Maag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States
Represented By: Bradley Hinshelwood
Represented By: Kyle T. Edwards
Represented By: Michael S. Raab Esq.
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Abby Christine Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, in his official capacity
Represented By: Bradley Hinshelwood
Represented By: Kyle T. Edwards
Represented By: Michael S. Raab Esq.
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Abby Christine Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARVIN G. RICHARDSON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Represented By: Bradley Hinshelwood
Represented By: Kyle T. Edwards
Represented By: Michael S. Raab Esq.
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Abby Christine Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?