Canon Inc.In re: Canon Inc.
| In re: CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC. |
| WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, dba Brazos Licensing and Development and NXP USA, INC. |
| 22-130 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed directing WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development to respond to the petition no later than seven days from the date of filing of this order. NXP USA, Inc. also may respond within that time. Any reply in support of the petition is due no later than three days thereafter. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [837142] [LMS] [Entered: 03/16/2022 09:52 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Petitioners Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. Service: 03/15/2022 by US mail, clerk. [836811] [EKD] [Entered: 03/15/2022 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Eric Shumsky; Joseph Calvaruso; Michael Chow; Zachary Hennessee; Richard Martinelli; and Emily Villano as counsel for Petitioners Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. Service: 03/15/2022 by US mail, clerk. [836810] [EKD] [Entered: 03/15/2022 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioners Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 03/15/2022 by US mail, clerk. [836808] [EKD] [Entered: 03/15/2022 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 03/15/2022. [836807] Entry of Appearance is due on 03/29/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 03/29/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 03/15/2022 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
