Interactive Games LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.
| INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC |
| DRAFTKINGS, INC. |
| 22-1517 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/08/2022. [835517] Entry of Appearance is due on 03/22/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 03/22/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 03/22/2022. Certified List is due on 04/18/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 03/08/2022 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Interactive Games LLC v. DraftKings, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy P. McAnulty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: DRAFTKINGS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | George Hopkins Guy III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
