Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: FICEP CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee: PEDDINGHAUS CORPORATION
Case Number: 22-1590
Filed: March 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 21, 2023 FICEP CORPORATION v. PEDDINGHAUS CORPORATION

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 9 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Ficep Corporation. The opening brief is due 06/14/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [850745] [ALK] [Entered: 05/19/2022 02:17 PM]
May 18, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION of Appellant Ficep Corporation to extend the time to 06/14/2022 to file brief. Service: 05/18/2022 by email. [850475] [22-1590] [Sarah Rieger] [Entered: 05/18/2022 01:44 PM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Ficep Corporation. Service: 04/13/2022 by email. [842713] [22-1590] [Matthew Lowrie] [Entered: 04/13/2022 10:05 AM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Ficep Corporation. Service: 04/13/2022 by email. [842711] [22-1590] [Matthew Lowrie] [Entered: 04/13/2022 10:00 AM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Matthew B. Lowrie; Kevin M. Littman; Sarah E. Rieger as counsel for Appellant Ficep Corporation. Service: 04/13/2022 by email. [842710] [22-1590] [Matthew Lowrie] [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:57 AM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Peddinghaus Corporation. Service: 04/11/2022 by email. [842371] [22-1590] [Stephanie Koh] [Entered: 04/11/2022 01:41 PM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Peddinghaus Corporation. Service: 04/11/2022 by email. [842370] [22-1590] [Stephanie Koh] [Entered: 04/11/2022 01:40 PM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Stephanie P. Koh as counsel for Appellee Peddinghaus Corporation. Service: 04/11/2022 by email. [842369] [22-1590] [Stephanie Koh] [Entered: 04/11/2022 01:39 PM]
March 30, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/29/2022. [839976] Entry of Appearance is due on 04/13/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/13/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 04/13/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 05/31/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 03/30/2022 04:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: FICEP CORPORATION
Represented By: Robert M. Vrana
Represented By: Matthew B. Lowrie
Represented By: Kevin M. Littman Esq.
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Rieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PEDDINGHAUS CORPORATION
Represented By: Kelly Farnan
Represented By: Stephanie P. Koh Esq.
Represented By: Nathaniel C. Love
Represented By: Leif E. Peterson II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?