Cooke v. DHS
Petitioner: EDWIN S. COOKE
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Case Number: 22-1643
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 8, 2022 COOKE v. MSPB

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/08/2022. [843201] Fee/IFP due on 04/28/2022. 15(c) due on 04/28/2022. Entry of Appearance due 04/28/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/28/2022. Docketing Statement due 05/16/2022. [KMH] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:31 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cooke v. DHS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EDWIN S. COOKE
Represented By: Ricardo Pitts-Wiley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Represented By: Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?