Raffel Systems, LLC v. Bob's Discount Furniture LLC
| RAFFEL SYSTEMS, LLC |
| BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE LLC, MACY'S, INC. and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION |
| 22-1703 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER filed granting motion to stay appeal [ # 10 ] filed by Appellees. Within 14 days of the entry of final judgment by the district court in Man Wah, the parties are directed to inform this court as to how they believe this case should proceed. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [857567] [LMS] [Entered: 06/27/2022 12:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER staying the briefing schedule pending the court's disposition of this motion [ # 10 ]. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [853376] [LMS] [Entered: 06/03/2022 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 12 REPLY of Appellees Bob's Discount Furniture LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation to response [ # 11 ]. Service: 05/25/2022 by email. [851958] [22-1703] [Nicole Saharsky] [Entered: 05/25/2022 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE of Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC to Doc No. [ # 10 ]. Service: 05/18/2022 by email. [850562] [22-1703] [John Scheller] [Entered: 05/18/2022 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION of Appellees Bob's Discount Furniture LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation to stay appeal. Service: 05/13/2022 by email. [849651] [22-1703] [Nicole Saharsky] [Entered: 05/13/2022 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Bob's Discount Furniture LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. Service: 05/04/2022 by email. [847662] [22-1703] [Nicole Saharsky] [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Bob's Discount Furniture LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. Service: 05/04/2022 by email. [847661] [22-1703] [Nicole Saharsky] [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Nicole A. Saharsky; Gary M. Hnath; Michael L. Lindinger; Clark Bakewell; Minh Nguyen-Dang; Shen Wang; Hao Tan as counsel for Appellees Bob's Discount Furniture LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. Service: 05/04/2022 by email. [847660] [22-1703] [Nicole Saharsky] [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of appearance for David A. Casimir as counsel for Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC. Service: 04/26/2022 by email. [845590] [22-1703] [David Casimir] [Entered: 04/26/2022 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Tyler J. Sisk as counsel for Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC. Service: 04/26/2022 by email. [845588] [22-1703] [Tyler Sisk] [Entered: 04/26/2022 06:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC. Service: 04/25/2022 by email. [845283] [22-1703] [John Scheller] [Entered: 04/25/2022 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC. Service: 04/25/2022 by email. [845282] [22-1703] [John Scheller] [Entered: 04/25/2022 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for John C. Scheller; Michael D. Bess; Kenneth M. Albridge III; Brianna J. Siebken; J. Ryan Gray as counsel for Appellant Raffel Systems, LLC. Service: 04/25/2022 by email. [845280] [22-1703] [John Scheller] [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/15/2022. [844328] Entry of Appearance is due on 05/04/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/04/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 05/04/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 06/21/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 04/20/2022 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
