Martin v. US
| ROWLAND J. MARTIN and ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR. |
| UNITED STATES |
| 22-1810 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Amended docket sheet from United States Court of Federal Claims. [857309] [KMH] [Entered: 06/24/2022 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filing fee paid in the United States Court of Federal Claims on 06/16/2022. [856232] [KMH] [Entered: 06/17/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Amended docket sheet from United States Court of Federal Claims. [856231] [KMH] [Entered: 06/17/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Rowland J. Martin, Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance [ # 3 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 06/20/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [853663] [KMH] [Entered: 06/06/2022 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and consent to Electronic Filing for Appellant Rowland J. Martin. Service: 06/03/2022 by clerk. [853487] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 4 ] [VDW] [Entered: 06/03/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Joshua A. Mandlebaum as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 05/18/2022 by email, US mail. [850471] [22-1810] [Joshua Mandlebaum] [Entered: 05/18/2022 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/17/2022. [850391] Fee/IFP due on 06/01/2022. Entry of Appearance due 06/01/2022. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines. [KMH] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
