Magnacross LLC v. Oki Data Americas, Inc.
| MAGNACROSS LLC |
| OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. |
| 22-1840 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| MAGNACROSS LLC v. OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: Doc No. [ # 8 ], ERROR: Appellant's motion for extension of time does not include a Certificate of Compliance. CORRECTION: For future relevant filings, please include a certificate of compliance with the exact word/line count as required by Fed. R. App. P. 32(g). THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [857056] [ALK] [Entered: 06/23/2022 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Magnacross LLC. The opening brief is due 08/22/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [857055] [ALK] [Entered: 06/23/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION of Appellant Magnacross LLC to extend the time to 08/22/2022 to file brief. Service: 06/21/2022 by email. [856595] [22-1840] [David Bennett] [Entered: 06/21/2022 06:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Oki Data Americas, Inc.. Service: 06/10/2022 by email. [855014] [22-1840] [Marc Labgold] [Entered: 06/10/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Magnacross LLC. Service: 06/09/2022 by email. [854716] [22-1840] [David Bennett] [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Magnacross LLC. Service: 06/09/2022 by email. [854711] [22-1840] [David Bennett] [Entered: 06/09/2022 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of appearance for David R. Bennett as counsel for Appellant Magnacross LLC. Service: 06/09/2022 by email. [854709] [22-1840] [David Bennett] [Entered: 06/09/2022 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Oki Data Americas, Inc.. Service: 06/08/2022 by email. [854421] [22-1840] [Marc Labgold] [Entered: 06/08/2022 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Marc R. Labgold; Patrick J. Hoeffner as counsel for Appellee Oki Data Americas, Inc.. Service: 06/08/2022 by email. [854417] [22-1840] [Marc Labgold] [Entered: 06/08/2022 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/25/2022. [852582] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/14/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/14/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 06/14/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 08/01/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 05/31/2022 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Magnacross LLC v. Oki Data Americas, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MAGNACROSS LLC | |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Marc Robert Labgold |
| Represented By: | Patrick J. Hoeffner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.