Return Mail, Inc. v. US
Plaintiff / Appellant: RETURN MAIL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 22-1898
Filed: June 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 13, 2024 RETURN MAIL, INC. v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Return Mail, Inc.. Service: 07/13/2022 by email. [860835] [22-1898] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 07/13/2022 02:38 PM]
July 13, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: Doc No. [ # 7 ], ERROR: The document is not entirely text-searchable. CORRECTION: Please ensure all future filings are completely text-searchable as required by the court's Electronic Filing Procedures. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [860823] [EKD] [Entered: 07/13/2022 02:11 PM]
July 13, 2022 Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee US. Service: 07/13/2022 by email. [860813] [22-1898] [Shahar Harel] [Entered: 07/13/2022 01:55 PM]
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Return Mail, Inc. The opening brief is due 11/10/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [860452] [LMS] [Entered: 07/12/2022 10:55 AM]
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION of Appellant Return Mail, Inc. to extend the time to 11/10/2022 to file brief. Service: 07/08/2022 by email. [859975] [22-1898] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 07/08/2022 03:05 PM]
June 27, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Return Mail, Inc.. Service: 06/27/2022 by email. [857676] [22-1898] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 06/27/2022 04:15 PM]
June 27, 2022 Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Alfred R. Fabricant; Peter Lambrianakos; Vincent J. Rubino, III; Joseph M. Mercadante as counsel for Appellant Return Mail, Inc.. Service: 06/27/2022 by email. [857672] [22-1898] [Alfred Fabricant] [Entered: 06/27/2022 04:13 PM]
June 27, 2022 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Shahar Harel; Gary Hausken as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 06/27/2022 by email. [857535] [22-1898] [Shahar Harel] [Entered: 06/27/2022 11:37 AM]
June 13, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/10/2022. [855264] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/27/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/27/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 07/13/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 08/12/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Return Mail, Inc. v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RETURN MAIL, INC.
Represented By: Joseph M. Mercadante
Represented By: Alfred Ross Fabricant
Represented By: Peter Lambrianakos
Represented By: Vincent J. Rubino III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By: Shahar Harel
Represented By: Gary Lee Hausken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?