Sightline Payments, LLC v. Everi Holdings Inc.
| SIGHTLINE PAYMENTS, LLC |
| EVERI HOLDINGS INC., EVERI PAYMENTS INC., EVERI GAMES HOLDING INC. and EVERI GAMES INC. |
| 22-1956 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SIGHTLINE PAYMENTS, LLC v. EVERI HOLDINGS INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. The opening brief is due 10/28/2022. The response brief remains due 40 days after the appellant's brief is served. Fed. Cir. R. 31(a)(2). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [867784] [EKD] [Entered: 08/23/2022 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC to extend the time to 10/28/2022 to file brief. Service: 08/17/2022 by email. [867114] [22-1956] [Colby Springer] [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 10 Entry of appearance for Colby B. Springer; Jonathan R. Spivey; LaTasha Mabry Snipes; Joshua Louis Rayes; Melenie Van; Jahnathan L.D. Braquet as counsel for Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. Service: 07/18/2022 by email. [861659] [22-1956] [Colby Springer] [Entered: 07/18/2022 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 9 Corrected Entry of appearance for Michael D. Pegues as counsel for Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. Service: 07/13/2022 by email. [860902] [22-1956] [Michael Pegues] [Entered: 07/13/2022 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC, Entry of Appearance [ # 5 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 07/20/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [860700] [EKD] [Entered: 07/13/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860578] [22-1956] [Colby Springer] [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860572] [22-1956] [Colby Springer] [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Colby B. Springer; Jonathan R. Spivey; Michael Pegues; LaTasha Mabry Snipes; Joshua Louis Rayes; Melenie Van; Jahnathan L.D. Braquet as counsel for Appellant Sightline Payments, LLC. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860567] [22-1956] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Colby Springer] [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Everi Games Holding Inc., Everi Games Inc., Everi Holdings Inc. and Everi Payments Inc.. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860525] [22-1956] [John Artz] [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Everi Games Holding Inc., Everi Games Inc., Everi Holdings Inc. and Everi Payments Inc.. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860523] [22-1956] [John Artz] [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for John S. Artz; Steven A. Caloiaro as counsel for Appellees Everi Games Holding Inc., Everi Games Inc., Everi Holdings Inc. and Everi Payments Inc.. Service: 07/12/2022 by email. [860520] [22-1956] [John Artz] [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/24/2022. [857844] Entry of Appearance is due on 07/12/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/12/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 07/12/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 08/29/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 06/28/2022 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
