Fleet Engineers, Inc. v. Mudguard Technologies, LLC
Defendant: MUDGUARD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: FLEET ENGINEERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: TARUN SURTI and TARUN N SURTI
Case Number: 22-2001
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 15, 2023 FLEET ENGINEERS, INC. v. MUDGUARD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Filing 15 REPLY of Appellant Tarun N Surti to response [ # 14 ]. Service: 08/29/2022 by email. [868637]--[Edited 08/29/2022 by MMA - Reason: to correct filing event] [Tarun Surti] [Entered: 08/29/2022 12:30 PM]
August 26, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE of Cross-Appellant Fleet Engineers, Inc. to Doc No. [ # 12 ], [ # 12 ]. Service: 08/26/2022 by email. [868528] [22-2001] [George Williams] [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:57 PM]
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Fleet Engineers, Inc. is directed to respond to the motion within seven days from the date of filing of this order. Any reply in support of the motion is due no later than three days thereafter. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [867361] [NL] [Entered: 08/19/2022 12:26 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant Tarun N Surti to compel, to expedite. Service: 08/16/2022 by email. [866900] [22-2001]--[Edited 08/18/2022 by MMA to add relief] [Tarun Surti] [Entered: 08/16/2022 05:09 PM]
August 15, 2022 Filing 11 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 22-2001 (Lead) with 22-2076 (Cross Appeal). The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [866607] [22-2001, 22-2076] [MMA] [Entered: 08/15/2022 03:58 PM]
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER consolidating appeals (22-2001 and 22-2076). Mudguard Technologies, LLC's appellee designation is removed. The revised official caption is reflected in the order. (see order for details). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [866606] [22-2001, 22-2076] [MMA] [Entered: 08/15/2022 03:54 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 9 Filing fee paid in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan on 07/25/2022. [863863] [MMA] [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:03 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 8 Amended docket sheet from United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. [863862] [MMA] [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:01 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Fleet Engineers, Inc.. Service: 07/26/2022 by email. [863117] [22-2001] [George Williams] [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:43 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for G. Thomas Williams, III as counsel for Appellee Fleet Engineers, Inc.. Service: 07/26/2022 by email. [863115] [22-2001] [George Williams] [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:39 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Tarun N Surti. Service: 07/26/2022 by email. [863057] [22-2001] [Tarun Surti] [Entered: 07/26/2022 10:19 AM]
July 25, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Tarun N Surti, Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/01/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [862955] [MMA] [Entered: 07/25/2022 05:11 PM]
July 25, 2022 Filing 3 MODIFIED ENTRY: INFORMAL BRIEF FILED by Appellant Tarun N Surti. Service: 07/25/2022 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [862841]--[Edited 07/27/2022 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Tarun Surti] [Entered: 07/25/2022 12:29 PM]
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for TARUN N. SURTI, PRO SE as counsel for Appellant Tarun N Surti. Service: 07/25/2022 by email. [862839] [22-2001] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 4 ] [Tarun Surti] [Entered: 07/25/2022 12:19 PM]
July 12, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 07/07/2022. [860472] Fee/IFP due on 07/26/2022. Entry of Appearance due 07/26/2022. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines. [MMA] [Entered: 07/12/2022 12:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fleet Engineers, Inc. v. Mudguard Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: FLEET ENGINEERS, INC.
Represented By: George Thomas Williams III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUDGUARD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TARUN SURTI
Represented By: Tarun Surti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TARUN N SURTI
Represented By: Tarun N. Surti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?