One-E-Way, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
| ONE-E-WAY, INC. |
| APPLE INC. |
| 22-2020 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellee Apple Inc. The response brief is due 11/14/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [869213] [LMS] [Entered: 08/31/2022 12:27 PM]
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE of Appellant One-E-Way, Inc. to Doc No. [ # 13 ]. Service: 08/29/2022 by email. [868775] [22-2020] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 08/29/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION of Appellee Apple Inc. to extend the time to 11/14/2022 to file brief. Service: 08/29/2022 by email. [868646] [22-2020] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 08/29/2022 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 12 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant One-E-Way, Inc. Service: 08/22/2022 by email. [867730] --[Edited 08/23/2022 by EKD - compliance review complete] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 08/22/2022 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant One-E-Way, Inc., Opening Brief [ # 10 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 08/29/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [867590] [EKD] [Entered: 08/22/2022 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant One-E-Way, Inc. Service: 08/19/2022 by email. [867449] [22-2020] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 11 ] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 Corrected Entry of appearance for Douglas G. Muehlhauser; Payson J. LeMeilleur; Pushkal Mishra as counsel for Appellant One-E-Way, Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863890] [22-2020] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant One-E-Way, Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 5 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/05/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [863864] [ALK] [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant One-E-Way, Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863853] [22-2020] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellant One-E-Way, Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863851] [22-2020] [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Douglas G. Muelhauser; Payson J. LeMeilleur; Pushkal Mishra as counsel for Appellant One-E-Way, Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863848] [22-2020] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ]. [Douglas Muehlhauser] [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Apple Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863826] [22-2020] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Apple Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863825] [22-2020] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Heidi L. Keefe; Lowell D. Mead; Dena Chen; Benjamin S. Lin as counsel for Appellee Apple Inc.. Service: 07/29/2022 by email. [863824] [22-2020] [Heidi Keefe] [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 07/13/2022. [861138] Entry of Appearance is due on 07/29/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/29/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 07/29/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 09/13/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 07/15/2022 08:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
