Alexsam, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.
| ALEXSAM, INC. |
| AETNA, INC. |
| 22-2036 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: Doc No. [ # 12 ], ERROR: Appellant's motion does not include a Certificate of Compliance. CORRECTION: For future relevant filings, please include a certificate of compliance with the exact word/line count as required by Fed. R. App. P. 32(g). THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [868176] [ALK] [Entered: 08/24/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 13 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant Alexsam, Inc. The opening brief is due 11/15/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [868174] [ALK] [Entered: 08/24/2022 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant Alexsam, Inc. to extend the time to 11/15/2022 to file brief. Service: 08/24/2022 by email. [868064] [22-2036]--[Edited 08/24/2022 by KMH - to correct party filer] [W. Gresham] [Entered: 08/24/2022 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 11 Amended Docketing Statement for the Appellee Aetna, Inc.. Service: 08/02/2022 by email. [864380] [22-2036] [Thomas Rohback] [Entered: 08/02/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 Corrected Entry of appearance for Thomas G. Rohback; Matthew S. Murphy as counsel for Appellee Aetna, Inc.. Service: 08/02/2022 by email. [864379] [22-2036] [Thomas Rohback] [Entered: 08/02/2022 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellee Aetna, Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 6 ] and Docketing Statement [ # 7 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 08/08/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [864158] [ALK] [Entered: 08/01/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Aetna, Inc.. Service: 08/01/2022 by email. [864089] [22-2036] [Thomas Rohback] [Entered: 08/01/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Aetna, Inc.. Service: 08/01/2022 by email. [864087] [22-2036] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 9 ]. [Thomas Rohback] [Entered: 08/01/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Thomas G. Rohback; Matthew S. Murphy as counsel for Appellee Aetna, Inc.. Service: 08/01/2022 by email. [864084] [22-2036] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 9 ]. [Thomas Rohback] [Entered: 08/01/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 22-1599, 22-2036, and 22-2046. [863080] [22-1599, 22-2036, 22-2046] [EKD] [Entered: 07/26/2022 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Alexsam, Inc.. Service: 07/22/2022 by email. [862708] [22-2036] [Jacqueline Burt] [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Alexsam, Inc.. Service: 07/22/2022 by email. [862707] [22-2036] [Jacqueline Burt] [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for W. Lee Gresham, III; Jacqueline K. Burt; Timothy C. Davis; Steven W. Ritcheson as counsel for Appellant Alexsam, Inc.. Service: 07/22/2022 by email. [862706] [22-2036] [Jacqueline Burt] [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 07/18/2022. [861550] Entry of Appearance is due on 08/01/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 08/01/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 08/01/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 09/16/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 07/18/2022 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
