Whitacre v. Navy
| ROGER W. WHITACRE |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
| 22-2176 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| WHITACRE v. NAVY |
| WHITACRE v. NAVY |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 08/29/2022. [869492] 15(c) due on 09/15/2022. Entry of Appearance due 09/15/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/15/2022. Docketing Statement due 10/03/2022. Certified List due on 10/11/2022. [MMA] [Entered: 09/01/2022 12:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Whitacre v. Navy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROGER W. WHITACRE | |
| Represented By: | Dennis N. Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
