Corning Optical Communications LLC v. Dali Wireless Inc.
Appellant: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Appellee: DALI WIRELESS INC.
Case Number: 22-2243
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 19, 2023 CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC v. DALI WIRELESS INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Filing 9 Certified list received. Service: 11/02/2022 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [882053] [EKD] [Entered: 11/03/2022 01:54 PM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Dali Wireless Inc.. Service: 10/25/2022 by email. [880130] [22-2243] [David Schumann] [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:46 AM]
October 21, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Appellee Dali Wireless Inc.: The record of this case indicates that no Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [879545] [EKD] [Entered: 10/21/2022 03:15 PM]
October 7, 2022 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for David D. Schumann; Stefan Szpajda as counsel for Appellee Dali Wireless Inc.. Service: 10/07/2022 by email. [876664] [22-2243] [David Schumann] [Entered: 10/07/2022 02:14 PM]
October 7, 2022 Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Dali Wireless Inc.. Service: 10/07/2022 by email. [876662] [22-2243] [David Schumann] [Entered: 10/07/2022 02:13 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Corning Optical Communications LLC. Service: 10/06/2022 by email. [876385] [22-2243] [Michael Newton] [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:56 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Corning Optical Communications LLC. Service: 10/06/2022 by email. [876384] [22-2243] [Michael Newton] [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:55 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Michael J. Newton; Kirk Bradley; Christopher Douglas as counsel for Appellant Corning Optical Communications LLC. Service: 10/06/2022 by email. [876383] [22-2243] [Michael Newton] [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:53 PM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/19/2022. [873558] Entry of Appearance due 10/07/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/07/2022. Docketing Statement due 10/07/2022. Certified List due on 11/02/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 09/23/2022 08:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Corning Optical Communications LLC v. Dali Wireless Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Represented By: Christopher Timothy Lawn Douglas
Represented By: Michael J. Newton Esq.
Represented By: Kirk T. Bradley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: DALI WIRELESS INC.
Represented By: David Douglas Schumann Esq.
Represented By: Stefan Szpajda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?