Lopez v. US
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 22-2244
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous - Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 28, 2022 LOPEZ v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed; Mr. Lopez's supplemental opposition to the United States' motion for summary affirmance is due no later than December 2, 2022. ECF No. 5 [ # 5 ] is denied to the extent that the court will maintain Mr. Lopez's prior election to file all documents in paper form by mail or in person and to receive all service by mail only. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [883699] [LMS] [Entered: 11/14/2022 11:27 AM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Arthur Lopez, Certificate of Interest [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [880818] [KMH] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:28 AM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 7 MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE of Appellant Arthur Lopez to Doc No. [ # 3 ]. Service: 10/24/2022 by clerk. [879900]--[Edited 10/27/2022 by KMH] [VDW] [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:30 PM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Arthur Lopez. Service: 10/20/2022 by clerk. [879899] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [VDW] [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:29 PM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 5 MODIFIED ENTRY: MOTION of Appellant Arthur Lopez to extend time. Service: 10/24/2022 by clerk. [879898]--[Edited 10/27/2022 by KMH] [VDW] [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:27 PM]
October 7, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Arthur Lopez. Service: 10/07/2022 by clerk. [876734] [VDW] [Entered: 10/07/2022 04:04 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION of Appellee US for summary affirmance. Cases to be terminated: 22-2244. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion).. Service: 10/04/2022 by email, US mail. [876098] [22-2244] [Matthew Carhart] [Entered: 10/05/2022 01:33 PM]
September 28, 2022 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Matthew J. Carhart as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 09/28/2022 by email, US mail. [874565] [22-2244] [Matthew Carhart] [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:33 PM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/16/2022. [873575] Entry of Appearance due 10/07/2022. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines. [KMH] [Entered: 09/23/2022 09:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ARTHUR LOPEZ
Represented By: Arthur Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Matthew Jude Carhart
Represented By: Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?