Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. v. Google LLC
| MIRA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. |
| GOOGLE LLC |
| 22-2272 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| MIRA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 9 ] filed by Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. The opening brief is due 12/12/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [886453] [KMH] [Entered: 11/23/2022 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION of Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. to extend the time to 12/12/2022 to file brief. Service: 11/21/2022 by email. [885705] [22-2272] [Jundong Ma] [Entered: 11/21/2022 09:58 PM] |
| Filing 8 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.. Service: 10/14/2022 by email. [877773] [22-2272] [Jundong Ma] [Entered: 10/14/2022 01:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877474] [22-2272] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877473] [22-2272] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Adam D. Harber; Andrew V. Trask; D. Shayon Ghosh as counsel for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877472] [22-2272] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877470] [22-2272] [Jundong Ma] [Entered: 10/12/2022 08:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877469] [22-2272] [Jundong Ma] [Entered: 10/12/2022 08:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Jundong Ma as counsel for Appellant Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877468] [22-2272] [Jundong Ma] [Entered: 10/12/2022 08:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/23/2022. [874676] Entry of Appearance due 10/13/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/13/2022. Docketing Statement due 10/13/2022. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 11/28/2022. [KMH] [Entered: 09/29/2022 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. v. Google LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MIRA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jundong Ma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew V. Trask |
| Represented By: | Adam Harber |
| Represented By: | Debmallo Shayon Ghosh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
