D3D Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
| D3D TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
| 23-1011 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| D3D TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 The following conflict dates submitted by Nitika Gupta Fiorella for Microsoft Corporation have been accepted by the court: 09/07/2023, 09/08/2023. [933214] [MJL] [Entered: 06/29/2023 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 22 Notice from Appellee Microsoft Corporation regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/28/2023 by email. [933027] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 06/28/2023 08:46 PM] |
| Filing 21 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 15 ], [ # 14 ], [ # 10 ] received from Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc.. [929531] [VDW] [Entered: 06/13/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 20 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 13 ] received from Appellee Microsoft Corporation. [928904] [VDW] [Entered: 06/09/2023 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 19 Notice from Appellee Microsoft Corporation regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/07/2023 by email. [928499] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 18 Notice from Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/07/2023 by email. [928309] [23-1011] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 06/07/2023 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 17 Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found # here . The Oral Argument Guide can be found # here . [927757] [CMH] [Entered: 06/05/2023 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 16 Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [927755] [CMH] [Entered: 06/05/2023 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 15 MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc. Service: 05/04/2023 by email. [921075] --[Edited 05/19/2023 by CMH - compliance review complete] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 05/04/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 14 MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc.. Service: 04/28/2023 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [919717] --[Edited 05/10/2023 by JCW - compliance review complete] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 13 MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 04/07/2023 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [915467] --[Edited 04/18/2023 by CMH - compliance review complete] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 04/07/2023 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. The response brief is due 04/07/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [899353] [CAB] [Entered: 01/25/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION of Appellee Microsoft Corporation to extend the time to 04/07/2023 to file brief. Service: 01/24/2023 by email. [899132] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 01/24/2023 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc. Service: 01/12/2023 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [896615] --[Edited 01/12/2023 by EKD - compliance review complete] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 01/12/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certified list received. Service: 11/14/2022 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [884155] [EKD] [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 8 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 23-1011 and 23-1075. [880328] [23-1011, 23-1075] [EKD] [Entered: 10/26/2022 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/19/2022 by email. [879089] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:26 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/19/2022 by email. [879088] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Nitika Gupta Fiorella; Betty Chen; Aamir Kazi as counsel for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 10/19/2022 by email. [879087] [23-1011] [Nitika Gupta Fiorella] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc.. Service: 10/17/2022 by email. [878313] [23-1011] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 10/17/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc.. Service: 10/17/2022 by email. [878311] [23-1011] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 10/17/2022 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Tarek N. Fahmi as counsel for Appellant D3D Technologies, Inc.. Service: 10/17/2022 by email. [878310] [23-1011] [Tarek Fahmi] [Entered: 10/17/2022 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/04/2022. [876096] Entry of Appearance due 10/19/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/19/2022. Docketing Statement due 10/19/2022. Certified List due on 11/14/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 10/05/2022 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
