Cabezas v. Flint Group, LLC
| MARCO CABEZAS |
| FLINT GROUP, LLC |
| 23-1060 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment (Diversity) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER filed to show cause; Within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties are directed to show cause whether this case should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The briefing schedule is stayed. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [888150] [LMS] [Entered: 12/05/2022 09:45 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Appellant Marco Cabezas. Service: 11/21/2022 by email. [885330] [23-1060] [Christopher Ellison] [Entered: 11/21/2022 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Appellant Marco Cabezas. Service: 11/21/2022 by email. [885327] [23-1060] [Christopher Ellison] [Entered: 11/21/2022 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellant Marco Cabezas, Certificate of Interest and Docketing Statement [ # 4 ], [ # 5 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 11/30/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [885291] [EKD] [Entered: 11/21/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Christopher B. Ellison as counsel for Appellant Marco Cabezas. Service: 11/15/2022 by email. [884268] [23-1060] [Christopher Ellison] [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Marco Cabezas. Service: 11/15/2022 by email. [884267] [23-1060] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 7 ] [Christopher Ellison] [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Marco Cabezas. Service: 11/15/2022 by email. [884266] [23-1060] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 7 ] [Christopher Ellison] [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Flint Group, LLC. Service: 11/08/2022 by email. [882903] [23-1060] [Robin Samuel] [Entered: 11/08/2022 06:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Robin J. Samuel as counsel for Appellee Flint Group, LLC. Service: 11/08/2022 by email. [882902] [23-1060] [Robin Samuel] [Entered: 11/08/2022 06:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/17/2022. [879323] Entry of Appearance due 11/04/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/04/2022. Docketing Statement due 11/04/2022. Appellant's brief is due 12/20/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cabezas v. Flint Group, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MARCO CABEZAS | |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Ellison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: FLINT GROUP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Remy D. Snead |
| Represented By: | Robin J. Samuel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
