Roku, Inc.In re: Roku, Inc.
| In re: ROKU, INC. |
| IOENGINE, LLC |
| 23-114 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Roku, Inc. for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 01/06/2023 by US mail, email. [895348] [ALK] [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 01/06/2023. [895341] Fee/IFP is due on 01/20/2023. Entry of Appearance is due on 01/20/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 01/20/2023. [ALK] [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roku, Inc.In re: Roku, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: ROKU, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Tia Fenton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: IOENGINE, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Noah Leibowitz Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
