Panasonic Holdings Corp. v. Getac Technology Corp.
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP. |
GETAC TECHNOLOGY CORP. and GETAC, INC. |
23-1148 |
November 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP. v. GETAC TECHNOLOGY CORP. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc. The opening brief is due 02/16/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [892592] [KMH] [Entered: 12/23/2022 09:13 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION of Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc. to extend the time to 02/16/2023 to file brief. Service: 12/21/2022 by email. [892126] [23-1148] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 12/21/2022 02:12 PM] |
Filing 12 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc.. Service: 12/01/2022 by email. [887512] [23-1148] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 12/01/2022 12:08 PM] |
Filing 11 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Cross-Appellant Panasonic Holdings Corp.. Service: 11/30/2022 by email. [887374] [23-1148] [Kenneth Parker] [Entered: 11/30/2022 06:48 PM] |
Filing 10 Official caption revised to reflect Cross-Appeal 23-1202. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [887315] [KMH] [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:26 PM] |
Filing 9 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 23-1148 Lead with 23-1202 Cross-Appeal. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [887314] [23-1148, 23-1202] [KMH] [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:25 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellants Getac Technology Corp., Getac, Inc. and Appellee Panasonic Holdings Corp., Docketing Statements [ # 7 ], [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 12/07/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [887298] [KMH] [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:11 PM] |
Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Panasonic Holdings Corp.. Service: 11/29/2022 by email. [887070] [23-1148] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Kenneth Parker] [Entered: 11/29/2022 08:21 PM] |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Panasonic Holdings Corp.. Service: 11/29/2022 by email. [887069] [23-1148] [Kenneth Parker] [Entered: 11/29/2022 08:19 PM] |
Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Kenneth G. Parker; Jason T. Lao as counsel for Appellee Panasonic Holdings Corp.. Service: 11/29/2022 by email. [887067] [23-1148] [Kenneth Parker] [Entered: 11/29/2022 08:16 PM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc.. Service: 11/28/2022 by email. [886808] [23-1148] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 11/28/2022 05:56 PM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc.. Service: 11/28/2022 by email. [886807] [23-1148] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 11/28/2022 05:54 PM] |
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Christopher C. Campbell; Britton F. Davis; Joshua N. Mitchell; Jonathan Weinberg as counsel for Appellants Getac Technology Corp. and Getac, Inc.. Service: 11/28/2022 by email. [886806] [23-1148] [Jonathan Weinberg] [Entered: 11/28/2022 05:52 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/04/2022. [884171] Entry of Appearance due 11/29/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/29/2022. Docketing Statement due 11/29/2022. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 01/17/2023. [KMH] [Entered: 11/15/2022 01:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.