Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc.

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc.

Defendant:	AT&T INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:	TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:	SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP
Case Number:	23-1246
Filed:	December 15, 2022
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
July 13, 2023	TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. AT&T INC.

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
September 5, 2023	Filing 84 Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [947587] [23-1246, 23-1436] [MVH] [Entered: 09/05/2023 12:22 PM]
August 29, 2023	Filing 83 ORDER filed denying [ # 78 ] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Traxcell Technologies, LLC. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [946457] [MVH] [Entered: 08/29/2023 12:20 PM]
August 15, 2023	Filing 82 13 paper copies of Doc. No. [80] received from Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. [943279] [VDW] [Entered: 08/15/2023 03:40 PM]
August 15, 2023	Filing 81 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: Traxcell Technologies, LLC submitted an inadequate number of paper copies (see Doc. No. [80]). Pursuant to FCR 25(c)(3), 13 paper copies are required for petitions for rehearing en banc. CORRECTION: The court still requires 7 paper copies in this case. In the future, please ensure the appropriate number of copies are provided. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [943258] [MJL] [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:51 PM]
August 15, 2023	Filing 80 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 78 ] received from Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. [943243] [VDW] [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:18 PM]
August 11, 2023	Filing 79 Notice to Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC: The record of this case indicates that no paper copies of the petition for en banc rehearing [ # 78 ] under FCR 25(c)(3) have been filed. The required paper copies should be received by the court on or before 08/15/2023. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [942413] [JCP] [Entered: 08/11/2023 02:42 PM]
July 28, 2023	Filing 78 Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 07/28/2023 by email. [939250] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:05 PM]
July 28, 2023	Filing 77 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Petition for Rehearing En Banc [ # 76 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/04/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [939090] [MVH] [Entered: 07/28/2023 10:05 AM]
July 27, 2023	Filing 76 Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 07/27/2023 by email. [939031] [23-1246]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No.[ # 77 ] [William Ramey] [Entered: 07/27/2023 06:32 PM]
July 13, 2023	Filing 75 ORDER striking attorney entry of appearance [ # 71 ]. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [936007] [MVH] [Entered: 07/13/2023 10:45 AM]
July 13, 2023	Filing 74 JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Issued pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 36. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click # here . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [935991] [23-1246, 23-1436] [MVH] [Entered: 07/13/2023 10:21 AM]
July 11, 2023	Filing 73 Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Prost, Circuit Judge; Hughes, Circuit Judge and Cunningham, Circuit Judge. Arguing counsel: William Peterson Ramey, III for Traxcell Technologies, LLC and Brian David Schmalzbach for Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Sprint Communications Company LP. Oral Argument Audio available # here . [935472] [MJL] [Entered: 07/11/2023 03:51 PM]
June 28, 2023	Filing 72 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Entry of Appearance for Kyril Talanov [ # 71 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 07/06/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [932751] [MVH] [Entered: 06/28/2023 09:27 AM]
June 27, 2023	Filing 71 Entry of Appearance for Kyril Talanov as counsel for. Service: 06/27/2023 by email. [932682] [23-1246]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 72 ] [Kyril Talanov] [Entered: 06/27/2023 05:59 PM]
June 14, 2023	Filing 69 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 67 ], [ # 66 ], [ # 58 ] received from Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. [930034] [VDW] [Entered: 06/14/2023 02:56 PM]
June 13, 2023	Filing 70 6 paper copies of Doc. No. [ # 65 ] received from Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. [930035] [VDW] [Entered: 06/14/2023 03:00 PM]
June 13, 2023	Filing 68 ORDER filed striking [63], [64]. Please see order for full and complete details. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [929580] [MVH] [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:24 AM]
June 9, 2023	Filing 67 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 06/09/2023 by email. [929110]--[Edited 06/13/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/09/2023 06:41 PM]
June 9, 2023	Filing 66 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 06/09/2023 by email. [929108]--[Edited 06/13/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/09/2023 06:39 PM]
June 9, 2023	Filing 65 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 06/09/2023 by email. [928971]--[Edited 06/13/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:46 AM]
June 8, 2023	Filing 64 CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 06/08/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [928826] [23-1246]. Stricken pursuant to court order. See [ # 68 ]. [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/08/2023 04:54 PM]
June 8, 2023	Filing 63 CORRECTED APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 06/08/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [928820] [23-1246]. Stricken pursuant to court order. See [ # 68 ]. [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/08/2023 04:52 PM]
June 7, 2023	Filing 62 ORDER filed. The court accepts [ # 57 ], [58] . The parties are directed to file corrected briefs on or before 06/09/23. Please see the order for full details. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [928504] [MVH] [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:53 PM]
June 1, 2023	Filing 61 CORRECTED APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 06/01/2023 by email. [927264] [23-1246]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [ # 62 ]. Correction to this document is not required at this time.--[Edited 06/07/2023 by MVH] [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/01/2023 07:02 PM]
June 1, 2023	Filing 60 Notice Correcting Non-Confidential VOL. I OF II Coverpage. Service: 06/01/2023 by email. [927263] [23-1246] This document is non-compliant. Correction to this document is not required at this time.--[Edited 06/07/2023 by MVH] [William Ramey] [Entered: 06/01/2023 07:00 PM]
June 1, 2023	Filing 59 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Corrected Appendix [ # 57 ] and Corrected Confidential Appendix [58], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 06/08/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [927153] [CAB] [Entered: 06/01/2023 03:11 PM]
May 31, 2023	Filing 58 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 05/31/2023 by email. [926985]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 59 ]. This document has been accepted, see Doc. No. [ # 62 ]--[Edited 06/07/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/31/2023 09:26 PM]
May 31, 2023	Filing 57 MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 05/31/2023 by email. [926984]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 59 ]. This document has been accepted, see Doc. No. [ # 62 ]--[Edited 06/07/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/31/2023 09:23 PM]
May 25, 2023	Filing 56 Response to notice of oral argument from Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 05/25/2023 by email. [926047] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 05/25/2023 06:41 PM]
May 23, 2023	Filing 55 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Appendix and Confidential Appendix, [ # 50 ] and [ # 51 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 05/31/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [925361] [ALK] [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:47 PM]
May 23, 2023	Filing 54 ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file appendix [ # 49 ] filed by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Please see the order and the notice of non-compliance regarding the filing of corrected appendices. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [925358] [MVH] [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:34 PM]
May 22, 2023	Filing 53 Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 05/22/2023 by email. [925085] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/22/2023 04:09 PM]
May 22, 2023	Filing 52 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2307C. Case scheduled July 11, 2023. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 06/05/2023. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found # here . The Oral Argument Guide can be found # here . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [924992] [MJL] [Entered: 05/22/2023 02:18 PM]
May 17, 2023	Filing 51 CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 05/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [924228] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:37 PM]
May 17, 2023	Filing 50 CORRECTED APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 05/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [924227] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:30 PM]
May 17, 2023	Filing 49 MOTION of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC to extend the time to 05/17/2023 to file the appendix. Service: 05/17/2023 by email. [924225] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:17 PM]
May 16, 2023	Filing 48 ORDER filed. A motion for leave to file the appendix out of time and a corrected, compliant appendix are due 05/19/2023. See order for additional details. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [923742] [ALK] [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:07 PM]
May 8, 2023	Filing 47 Notice to Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC: The record of this case indicates that no Corrected Appendix under FCR 30(a)(2) has been filed. A motion for leave is required to file a document out of time. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [921761] [ALK] [Entered: 05/08/2023 10:56 AM]
April 27, 2023	Filing 46 Clerk's Note to the File: The conflict dates requested by Traxcell Technologies, LLC (see Doc. No. [ # 42 ]) do not fall within the court's scheduled argument sessions and are therefore not accepted. [919520] [MJL] [Entered: 04/27/2023 11:26 AM]
April 24, 2023	Filing 45 Notice from Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 04/24/2023 by email. [918644] [23-1246] [Jacob Baron] [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:08 PM]
April 24, 2023	Filing 44 Notice to Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP: The record of this case indicates that no Response to Notice of Oral Argument under FCR 34(e) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [918486] [ALK] [Entered: 04/24/2023 10:19 AM]
April 21, 2023	Filing 43 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Appendix [ # 37 ], [ # 38 ], [ # 39 ], [ # 40 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents due on 04/28/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [918383] [ALK] [Entered: 04/21/2023 04:41 PM]
April 20, 2023	Filing 42 Notice from Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 04/20/2023 by email. [918104] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/20/2023 07:35 PM]
April 19, 2023	Filing 41 Notice from Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, LP regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 04/19/2023 by email. [917768] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 04/19/2023 03:22 PM]
April 18, 2023	Filing 40 CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [917362] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/18/2023 12:23 AM]
April 18, 2023	Filing 39 CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [917361] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/18/2023 12:22 AM]
April 18, 2023	Filing 38 APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [917360] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/18/2023 12:21 AM]
April 18, 2023	Filing 37 APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/17/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [917359] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/18/2023 12:19 AM]
April 14, 2023	Filing 36 Notice to Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC: The record of this case indicates that no Appendix under FCR 30(a)(2) has been filed. A motion for leave is required to file a document out of time. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [916862] [ALK] [Entered: 04/14/2023 01:56 PM]
April 13, 2023	Filing 35 Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session month listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found # here . The Oral Argument Guide can be found # here . [916653] [ALK] [Entered: 04/13/2023 04:16 PM]
April 10, 2023	Filing 34 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/10/2023 by email. [915785] --[Edited 04/14/2023 by ALK - compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/10/2023 05:47 PM]
April 10, 2023	Filing 33 MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 04/10/2023 by email. [915734] --[Edited 04/14/2023 by ALK - compliance review complete] [William Ramey] [Entered: 04/10/2023 04:22 PM]
April 10, 2023	Filing 32 ORDER filed granting motion to reschedule argument [ # 30 ] filed by Appellees Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Sprint Communications Company LP. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [915671] [LMS] [Entered: 04/10/2023 02:31 PM]
April 5, 2023	Filing 31 ORDER Traxcell is directed to file a corrected brief, addressing the deficiencies above, within seven days from the date of filing of this order. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [914535] [LMS] [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:31 AM]
April 4, 2023	Filing 30 MOTION of Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, LP to reschedule argument. Service: 04/04/2023 by email. [914166] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 04/04/2023 08:57 AM]
March 27, 2023	Filing 29 MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP and Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 03/27/2023 by email. [912552] --[Edited 04/03/2023 by ALK - compliance review complete] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 03/27/2023 06:27 PM]
March 23, 2023	Filing 28 CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 03/23/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [911989] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 03/23/2023 04:28 PM]
March 22, 2023	Filing 27 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Opening Brief [ # 25 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/29/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [911718] [ALK] [Entered: 03/22/2023 04:40 PM]
March 21, 2023	Filing 26 ORDER filed denying [ # 12 ] motion for stay pending appeal under Rule 8/18 filed by Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [911347] [LMS] [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:28 PM]
March 20, 2023	Filing 25 CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 03/20/2023 by email. [910962] [23-1246] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 27 ]. [William Ramey] [Entered: 03/20/2023 02:27 PM]
March 16, 2023	Filing 24 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Opening Brief [ # 23 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [910508] [ALK] [Entered: 03/16/2023 04:21 PM]
March 13, 2023	Filing 23 CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 03/13/2023 by email. [909651] [23-1246] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 24 ]. [William Ramey] [Entered: 03/13/2023 08:29 PM]
March 10, 2023	Filing 22 EMERGENCY NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENTS BEARING ON TRAXCELL'S PENDING MOTION FOR STAY AND REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE RULING THEREON for Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 03/10/2023 by email. [909311] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 03/10/2023 06:02 PM]
March 9, 2023	Filing 21 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC, Opening Brief [ # 19 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/16/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [908800] [ALK] [Entered: 03/09/2023 11:07 AM]
March 1, 2023	Filing 20 REPLY of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC to response [ # 18 ]. Service: 03/01/2023 by email. [907269] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 03/01/2023 05:21 PM]
February 27, 2023	Filing 19 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 02/27/2023 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [906666] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 02/27/2023 10:46 PM]
February 21, 2023	Filing 18 RESPONSE of Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP to Doc No. [ # 12 ]. Service: 02/21/2023 by email. [905298] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 02/21/2023 04:42 PM]
February 13, 2023	Filing 17 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 02/13/2023 by email. [903918] [23-1246] [Jacob Baron] [Entered: 02/13/2023 07:54 PM]
February 13, 2023	Filing 16 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 02/13/2023 by email. [903917] [23-1246] [Jacob Baron] [Entered: 02/13/2023 07:50 PM]
February 13, 2023	Filing 15 Entry of appearance for Jacob K. Baron; Joshua Krumholz; Allison Lucier as counsel for Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Service: 02/13/2023 by email. [903915] [23-1246] [Jacob Baron] [Entered: 02/13/2023 07:48 PM]
February 13, 2023	Filing 14 ORDER filed granting motion to expedite [ # 13 ] only to the extent that Traxcell's opening brief is due February 27, 2023; the appellees' response briefs are due no later than March 27, 2023; Traxcell's reply brief and the joint appendix are due no later than April 10, 2023, and the case will be placed on the June 2023 oral argument calendar. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [903811] [LMS] [Entered: 02/13/2023 03:06 PM]
February 10, 2023	Filing 13 MOTION of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC to expedite briefing schedule. Service: 02/10/2023 by email. [903510] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 02/10/2023 01:51 PM]
February 8, 2023	Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC STAY ENFORCEMENT AND WAIVER OF APPEAL BOND OR IN ALTERNATIVE A REDUCED BOND. Service: 02/08/2023 by email. [903005] [23-1246] [Kyril Talanov] [Entered: 02/08/2023 07:29 PM]
February 2, 2023	Filing 11 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 23-1246 (Lead) with 23-1436 (Member). The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [901649] [23-1246, 23-1436] [ALK] [Entered: 02/02/2023 04:37 PM]
February 2, 2023	Filing 10 ORDER consolidating appeals 23-1246 and 23-1436. Appellant's opening brief is due no later than March 31, 2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [901648] [23-1246, 23-1436] [ALK] [Entered: 02/02/2023 04:35 PM]
January 9, 2023	Filing 9 Notice to Appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b), no Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4, and no Docketing Statement under FCR 33.1(a) have been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [895515] [ALK] [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:32 AM]
December 27, 2022	Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, LP. Service: 12/27/2022 by email. [893152] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 12/27/2022 04:21 PM]
December 27, 2022	Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, LP. Service: 12/27/2022 by email. [893151] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 12/27/2022 04:19 PM]
December 27, 2022	Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Brian D. Schmalzbach; David E. Finkelson; Tyler T. VanHoutan as counsel for Appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, LP. Service: 12/27/2022 by email. [893143] [23-1246] [Brian Schmalzbach] [Entered: 12/27/2022 04:09 PM]
December 27, 2022	Filing 5 Transcript Purchase Order Form for the Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC indicating that a transcript is not needed for the appeal. Service: 12/27/2022 by email. [893127] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 12/27/2022 03:38 PM]
December 27, 2022	Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 12/27/2022 by email. [893117] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 12/27/2022 03:24 PM]
December 21, 2022	Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 12/21/2022 by email. [892277] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 12/21/2022 06:04 PM]
December 21, 2022	Filing 2 Entry of appearance for William P. Ramey, III as counsel for Appellant Traxcell Technologies, LLC. Service: 12/21/2022 by email. [892210] [23-1246] [William Ramey] [Entered: 12/21/2022 03:55 PM]
December 15, 2022	Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 12/05/2022. [890800] Entry of Appearance is due on 12/29/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/29/2022. Docketing Statement is due on 12/29/2022. Appellant's brief is due on 02/13/2023. [ALK] [Entered: 12/15/2022 10:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Represented By:	William Peterson Ramey III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP
Represented By:	Justin R. Lowery Esq.
Represented By:	Brian David Schmalzbach
Represented By:	David Evan Finkelson
Represented By:	Tyler VanHoutan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP
Represented By:	Justin R. Lowery Esq.
Represented By:	David Evan Finkelson
Represented By:	Brian David Schmalzbach
Represented By:	Tyler VanHoutan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Represented By:	Justin R. Lowery Esq.
Represented By:	Brian David Schmalzbach
Represented By:	David Evan Finkelson
Represented By:	Tyler VanHoutan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP
Represented By:	Alison Haddock Hutton
Represented By:	Jacob Kevin Baron Esq.
Represented By:	Joshua C. Krumholz Esq.
Represented By:	Allison Lucier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?