Stein v. Gill
| KATHLYN M. STEIN |
| DUANE B. GILL, Director, VA Central Western MA Health Care System, in his official capacity |
| 23-1265 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment (US Def.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice from Appellee Duane B. Gill Intent To File Formal Brief. Service: 01/30/2023 by email. [900426] [23-1265] [Steven Mager] [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 MODIFIED ENTRY: INFORMAL BRIEF FILED with APPENDIX by Appellant Ms. Kathlyn M. Stein. Service: 01/09/2023 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [895636] --[Edited 01/12/2023 by KMH - compliance review complete] [Kathlyn Stein] [Entered: 01/09/2023 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of appearance for Steven Michael Mager as counsel for Appellee Duane B. Gill. Service: 01/03/2023 by email. [894260] [23-1265] [Steven Mager] [Entered: 01/03/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Ms. Kathlyn M. Stein. Service: 12/23/2022 by email. [892794] [23-1265] [Kathlyn Stein] [Entered: 12/23/2022 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Note to the File: Appeal transferred from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit; Case No. 22-1573. [891830] [KMH] [Entered: 12/20/2022 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 12/08/2022. [891828] Entry of Appearance due 01/03/2023. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines.--[Edited 12/20/2022 by KMH to correct deadlines] [KMH] [Entered: 12/20/2022 01:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
