In re: Microsoft Corporation
| In re: MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
| VIRTRU CORP. |
| 23-128 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER filed granting the Petition for Writ of Mandamus [ # 2 ] filed by Petitioner Microsoft Corporation. The district court's order denying transfer is vacated, and the district court is directed to grant the transfer motion. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [928347] [LMS] [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY of Petitioner Microsoft Corporation to response [ # 14 ]. Service: 04/26/2023 by email. [919406] [23-128] [Jason Wolff] [Entered: 04/26/2023 08:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE of Respondent Virtru Corp. to Doc No. [ # 2 ]. Service: 04/21/2023 by email. [918421] [23-128] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
Amended Certificate of Interest for Respondent Virtru Corp.. Service: 04/21/2023 by email. [918352] [23-128] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 04/21/2023 03:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
Entry of Appearance for Mark L. Whitaker; Brian C. Nash; Rudy Y. Kim; Fitz Beckwith Collings as counsel for Respondent Virtru Corp.. Service: 04/21/2023 by email. [918348] [23-128] [Mark Whitaker] [Entered: 04/21/2023 03:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file [ # 10 ] filed by Petitioner Microsoft Corporation. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [917467] [LMS] [Entered: 04/18/2023 12:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION of Petitioner Microsoft Corporation to extend the time to 04/26/2023 to file brief. Service: 04/12/2023 by email. [916309] [23-128] [Jason Wolff] [Entered: 04/12/2023 02:41 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file [ # 8 ] filed by Respondent Virtru Corp. Any response to the petition is due no later than April 21, 2023, and any reply will be due no later than April 24, 2023. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [913391] [LMS] [Entered: 03/30/2023 03:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION of Respondent Virtru Corp. to extend time. Service: 03/29/2023 by email. [913198] [23-128] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
Certificate of Interest for Respondent Virtru Corp.. Service: 03/29/2023 by email. [913194] [23-128] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Entry of Appearance for Brian R. Matsui; Seth W. Lloyd as counsel for Respondent Virtru Corp.. Service: 03/29/2023 by email. [913193] [23-128] [Brian Matsui] [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER filed directing Virtru Corporation to respond to the petition within seven days from the date of filing of this order. Any reply in support of the petition is due no later than three days thereafter. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [913101] [LMS] [Entered: 03/29/2023 03:43 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Microsoft Corporation. Service: 03/28/2023 by US mail. [912832] [ALK] [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
Entry of Appearance for Jason W. Wolff; Betty H. Chen; Ashley Bolt; John A. Dragseth as counsel for Petitioner Microsoft Corporation. Service: 03/28/2023 by US Mail. [912830] [ALK] [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION of Petitioner Microsoft Corporation for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 03/28/2023 by email. [912828] [ALK] [Entered: 03/29/2023 08:59 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 03/28/2023. [912819] Entry of Appearance is due on 04/12/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/12/2023. [ALK] [Entered: 03/29/2023 08:51 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
