Lomax v. Montaldo
| MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR. |
| HARVEY RUVIN, SHIRLEY SHABAZZ, MICHAEL HENDERSON, LISA LESUER, CHARLENE STAFFORD, TANYA WATKING, ALAN ADRIAN TAYLOR and LUIS G. MONTALDO |
| 23-1456 |
| February 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Assault, Libel & Slander (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE of Appellee Luis G. Montaldo to Doc. No. [ # 11 ], [ # 11 ]. Service: 04/03/2023 by email. [914120] [23-1456] [Ilene Pabian] [Entered: 04/03/2023 05:26 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER filed to show cause; Within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties are directed to show cause whether this case should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The briefing schedule is stayed. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [911909] [LMS] [Entered: 03/23/2023 02:39 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Appellees Michael Henderson, Lisa Lesuer, Shirley Shabazz, Charlene Stafford and Alan Adrian Taylor: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b) and Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Please file promptly . Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [911208] [MMA] [Entered: 03/21/2023 11:10 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting motion to modify the official caption [ # 7 ] filed by Appellee Harvey Ruvin. The revised official caption and short caption are reflected in this order. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [910013] [LMS] [Entered: 03/15/2023 10:44 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Entry of Appearance for Ilene L. Pabian as counsel for Appellee Harvey Ruvin. Service: 03/09/2023 by email. [908992] [23-1456] [Ilene Pabian] [Entered: 03/09/2023 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION of Appellee Harvey Ruvin to modify the official caption. Service: 03/09/2023 by email. [908990] [23-1456] [Ilene Pabian] [Entered: 03/09/2023 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Harvey Ruvin, Entry of Appearance [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/13/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [908084] [MMA] [Entered: 03/06/2023 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Electronic Filing for Appellant Miss Mattie Twynette Lomax, Sr. Service: 03/03/2023 by email. [907551]--[Edited 03/06/2023 by MMA - Reason: to correct filing event] [Mattie Lomax] [Entered: 03/03/2023 02:02 AM] |
| Filing 4 Entry of Appearance for Ilene L. Pabian as counsel for Appellee Harvey Ruvin. Service: 02/28/2023 by email. [906928] [23-1456] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 6 ] [Ilene Pabian] [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Miss Mattie Twynette Lomax, Sr., Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/02/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [905884] [MMA] [Entered: 02/23/2023 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Mattie Lomax as counsel for. Service: 02/18/2023 by email. [905005] [23-1456] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 3 ] [Mattie Lomax] [Entered: 02/18/2023 09:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 01/26/2023. [901748] Entry of Appearance due 02/17/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 02/17/2023. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines. [MMA] [Entered: 02/03/2023 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
