Amezquita v. McDonough
| EDWARD AMEZQUITA |
| DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
| 23-1975 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/26/2023. [927647] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/20/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/20/2023. Docketing Statement is due on 07/05/2023. Appellant's brief is due on 08/04/2023. [ALK] [Entered: 06/05/2023 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Amezquita v. McDonough | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Claimant: EDWARD AMEZQUITA | |
| Represented By: | Kent A. Eiler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
