Hippely v. US
| JOHN HIPPELY, ANTHONY CAICCO, BENNETT COBB, SR., ERIC FINCHAM, MARILYN LANNING, HAROLD LANNING, ROSALIE LANNING, RICHARD MOWEN, ELAINE MOWEN, WARREN R.C. INC., RICHARD L. GWIN, DEBORAH A. GWIN and OHIO EDISON CO. |
| UNITED STATES |
| 23-2271 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Taking - Rails to Trails |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant US.; issuing mandate. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [953676] [JCW] [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION of Appellant US to voluntarily dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Service: 09/28/2023 by email. [953159] [23-2271] [Amelia Yowell] [Entered: 09/28/2023 02:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
Docketing Statement for the Appellant US. Service: 09/11/2023 by email. [949087] [23-2271] [Amelia Yowell] [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:43 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
Docketing Statement for the Appellees Anthony Caicco, Bennett Cobb, Sr., Eric Fincham, Deborah A. Gwin, Richard L. Gwin, John Hippely, Harold Lanning, Marilyn Lanning, Rosalie Lanning, Elaine Mowen, Richard Mowen, Ohio Edison Co. and Warren R.C. Inc.. Service: 09/11/2023 by email. [949030] [23-2271] [Thomas Stewart] [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
Corrected Entry of Appearance for Thomas S. Stewart; Reed W. Ripley as counsel for Appellees Anthony Caicco, Bennett Cobb, Sr., Eric Fincham, Deborah A. Gwin, Richard L. Gwin, John Hippely, Harold Lanning, Marilyn Lanning, Rosalie Lanning, Elaine Mowen, Richard Mowen, Ohio Edison Co. and Warren R.C. Inc.. Service: 08/30/2023 by email. [946768] [23-2271] [Thomas Stewart] [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees Anthony Caicco, Bennett Cobb, Sr., Eric Fincham, Deborah A. Gwin, Richard L. Gwin, John Hippely, Harold Lanning, Marilyn Lanning, Rosalie Lanning, Elaine Mowen, Richard Mowen, Ohio Edison Co. and Warren R.C. Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 3 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 09/07/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [946756] [KMH] [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
Official caption revised to add Plaintiff-Appellees. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [946752] [KMH] [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:27 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interest for Appellees Anthony Caicco, Bennett Cobb, Sr., Eric Fincham, John Hippely, Harold Lanning, Marilyn Lanning, Rosalie Lanning, Elaine Mowen, Richard Mowen and Warren R.C. Inc. Richard L. Gwin; Deborah A. Gwin; Ohio Edison Company. Service: 08/24/2023 by email. [945554] [23-2271] [Thomas Stewart] [Entered: 08/24/2023 10:26 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
Entry of Appearance for Thomas S. Stewart; Reed W. Ripley as counsel for Appellees Anthony Caicco, Bennett Cobb, Sr., Eric Fincham, John Hippely, Harold Lanning, Marilyn Lanning, Rosalie Lanning, Elaine Mowen, Richard Mowen and Warren R.C. Inc. Richard L. Gwin; Deborah A. Gwin; Ohio Edison Company. Service: 08/24/2023 by email. [945552] [23-2271] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 6 ] [Thomas Stewart] [Entered: 08/24/2023 10:23 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
Entry of Appearance for Amelia G. Yowell as counsel for Appellant US. Service: 08/18/2023 by email. [944326] [23-2271] [Amelia Yowell] [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
Appeal docketed. Received: 08/08/2023. [942381] Entry of Appearance due 08/25/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 08/25/2023. Docketing Statement due 09/11/2023. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 10/10/2023. [KMH] [Entered: 08/11/2023 01:28 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
