Thacker v. US
DAVID KENT THACKER, JR. |
UNITED STATES |
23-2333 |
August 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER filed denying [ # 3 ] motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Kent Thacker, Jr. Absent the payment of the filing fee within 30 days of the date of entry of this order, the appeal will be dismissed. See Fed. Cir. R. 52(d). (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [959246] [LMS] [Entered: 10/26/2023 01:07 PM] |
Filing 11 Paper document received from David Kent Thacker, Jr. (PENDING REVIEW). [957478] [ALK] [Entered: 10/19/2023 09:36 AM] |
Filing 10 Paper document received from David Kent Thacker, Jr.. (PENDING REVIEW). [955813] [ALK] [Entered: 10/12/2023 10:07 AM] |
Filing 9 Paper document received from David Kent Thacker, Jr. (PENDING REVIEW). [955812] [ALK] [Entered: 10/12/2023 10:06 AM] |
Filing 8 Entry of Appearance for Delisa M. Sanchez as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 09/29/2023 by email, US mail. [953325] [23-2333] [Delisa Sanchez] [Entered: 09/29/2023 11:54 AM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant David Kent Thacker, Jr., Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 10/10/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [952063] [ALK] [Entered: 09/25/2023 09:06 AM] |
Filing 6 Paper document received from David Kent Thacker, Jr. (PENDING REVIEW). [951488] [ALK] [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:42 AM] |
Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant David Kent Thacker, Jr. Service: 09/21/2023 by clerk. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [951486] [ALK] [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:41 AM] |
Filing 4 Supplemental in Forma Pauperis Form for Prisoners for Appellant David Kent Thacker, Jr. Service: 09/21/2023 by clerk. [951484] [ALK] [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:40 AM] |
Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant David Kent Thacker, Jr. for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. Service: 09/21/2023 by email. [951483] [ALK] [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:39 AM] |
Filing 2 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant David Kent Thacker, Jr. Service: 09/21/2023 by clerk. [951482] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 7 ]. [ALK] [Entered: 09/21/2023 11:37 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 08/22/2023. [946143] Fee/IFP is due on 09/11/2023. Entry of Appearance is due on 09/11/2023. Appellant's brief is due on 10/27/2023. [ALK] [Entered: 08/28/2023 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Thacker v. US | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID KENT THACKER, JR. | |
Represented By: | David Kent Thacker Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES | |
Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
Represented By: | Delisa Sanchez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.