CTD Networks, LLC v. Google LLC
| CTD NETWORKS, LLC |
| GOOGLE LLC |
| 23-2428 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. The opening brief is due 12/27/2023. Order moots prior motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant CTD Networks, LLC based on corrected motion [ # 13 ] filed afterwards. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [964177] [JSP] [Entered: 11/17/2023 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 Notice of Correction to Doc No. [ # 12 ] for Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. Service: 11/16/2023 by email. [964038] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 11/16/2023 07:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION of Appellant CTD Networks, LLC to extend the time to 12/27/2023 to file brief. Service: 11/16/2023 by email. [964035] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 11/16/2023 07:10 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant CTD Networks, LLC to extend the time to 12/27/2023 to file brief. Service: 11/16/2023 by email. [963998] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 11/16/2023 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Vincent Y. Ling; Heather E. Takahashi; Evan Mann; Adam W. Kwon as counsel for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/12/2023 by email. [955772] [23-2428] [Vincent Ling] [Entered: 10/12/2023 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 10 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. Service: 10/11/2023 by email. [955732] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 10/11/2023 08:28 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. Service: 10/11/2023 by email. [955731] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 10/11/2023 08:27 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. Service: 10/11/2023 by email. [955730] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 10/11/2023 08:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Entry of Appearance for William P. Ramey, III as counsel for Appellant CTD Networks, LLC. Service: 10/11/2023 by email. [955729] [23-2428] [William Ramey] [Entered: 10/11/2023 08:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Google LLC, Entry of Appearance [ # 3 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 10/17/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [955321] [JSP] [Entered: 10/10/2023 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/06/2023 by email. [955032] [23-2428] [Vincent Ling] [Entered: 10/06/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/06/2023 by email. [955031] [23-2428] [Vincent Ling] [Entered: 10/06/2023 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Entry of Appearance for Vincent Y. Ling; Heather E. Takahashi; Evan Mann; Adam W. Kwon as counsel for Appellee Google LLC. Service: 10/06/2023 by email. [955030] [23-2428] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 6 ] [Vincent Ling] [Entered: 10/06/2023 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 23-2428 and 23-2429. [954887] [23-2428, 23-2429] [JSP] [Entered: 10/06/2023 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/20/2023. [952847] Fee/IFP due on 10/11/2023. Entry of Appearance due 10/11/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/11/2023. Docketing Statement due 10/11/2023. Appellant's brief is due 11/27/2023. [MMA] [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.