BertiniIn re: Bertini
| In re: CHARLES BERTINI |
| APPLE INC. |
| 24-105 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Entry of Appearance for James Bertini as counsel for Petitioner Charles Bertini. Service: 11/01/2023 by clerk. [960588] [KMH] [Entered: 11/01/2023 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Charles Bertini for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 10/31/2023 by email. [960586] [KMH] [Entered: 11/01/2023 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 10/31/2023. [960583] Entry of Appearance due 11/15/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/15/2023. [KMH] [Entered: 11/01/2023 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: BertiniIn re: Bertini | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: CHARLES BERTINI | |
| Represented By: | James Bertini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: APPLE INC. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph E. Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
