PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. v. iFit, Inc.
| POWERBLOCK HOLDINGS, INC. |
| IFIT, INC. |
| 24-1177 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re: Doc No. [ # 8 ], ERROR: Appellant's motion does not include the certificate of interest under FCR 47.4(b) and the certificate of compliance with the word count under FRAP 31(g)(1). CORRECTION: The required certificates must be included in future filings. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [975730] [MMA] [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. The opening brief is due 02/05/2024. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [975724] [MMA] [Entered: 01/10/2024 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION of Appellant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. to extend the time to 02/05/2024 to file brief. Service: 01/09/2024 by email. [975396] [24-1177] [Thomas Leach] [Entered: 01/09/2024 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee iFit, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967903] [24-1177] [Mark Ford] [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellee iFit, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967900] [24-1177] [Mark Ford] [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Mark W. Ford; L. Rex Sears as counsel for Appellee iFit, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967897] [24-1177] [Mark Ford] [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967806] [24-1177] [Thomas Leach] [Entered: 12/05/2023 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967803] [24-1177] [Thomas Leach] [Entered: 12/05/2023 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Thomas J. Leach; Michael A. Erbele as counsel for Appellant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.. Service: 12/05/2023 by email. [967798] [24-1177] [Thomas Leach] [Entered: 12/05/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 11/13/2023. [964989] Entry of Appearance is due on 12/05/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 12/05/2023. Docketing Statement is due on 12/05/2023. Appellant's brief is due on 01/22/2024. [GWK] [Entered: 11/21/2023 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. v. iFit, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: POWERBLOCK HOLDINGS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Leach III |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Erbele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: IFIT, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Mark W. Ford |
| Represented By: | Lannie Rex Sears |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
