Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. IBM
| EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION |
| 24-1459 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 02/05/2024. [983047] Entry of Appearance is due on 02/26/2024. Certificate of Interest is due on 02/26/2024. Docketing Statement is due on 02/26/2024. Certified List is due on 03/25/2024. [GWK] [Entered: 02/12/2024 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. IBM | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards | |
| Represented By: | Heath Briggs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Taeg Sang Cho |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
