In re: Amoss
In re: MATTHEW AMOSS |
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
24-1617 |
March 29, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/25/2024. [993756] Entry of Appearance due 04/12/2024. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/12/2024. Docketing Statement due 04/29/2024. Certified List due on 05/08/2024. [GWK] [Entered: 03/29/2024 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Amoss | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: In re: MATTHEW AMOSS | |
Represented By: | Fabian Nehrbass |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
Represented By: | Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.