Bennett v. US
| JAMES BENNETT |
| UNITED STATES |
| 24-1674 |
| April 11, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Amended docket sheet from United States Court of Federal Claims. [996850] [ALK] [Entered: 04/11/2024 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/08/2024. [996700] Fee/IFP is due on 04/25/2024. Entry of Appearance is due on 04/25/2024. Appellant's brief is due on 06/10/2024. [ALK] [Entered: 04/11/2024 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bennett v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES BENNETT | |
| Represented By: | James Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Shane Beckrich |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
