Cali v. Navy
| PETER R CALI |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
| 24-1722 |
| April 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid. Fee Amount: $600.00. Receipt Number: A13-40919-532. [999398] [24-1722] [Peter Cali] [Entered: 04/23/2024 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 04/19/2024. [999312] Fee/IFP is due on 05/07/2024. 15(c) is due on 05/07/2024. Entry of Appearance is due on 05/07/2024. Certified List is due on 06/03/2024. [ALK] [Entered: 04/23/2024 09:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cali v. Navy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PETER R CALI | |
| Represented By: | Peter R. Cali |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
