DivX, LLC v. Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
| DIVX, LLC |
| LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS INC. and REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION |
| 24-2061 |
| July 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| DIVX, LLC v. REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corrected Docketing Statement for the Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. Service: 08/19/2024 by email. [1026107] [24-2061] [Theodore Angelis] [Entered: 08/19/2024 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 12 Notice to Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation: The record of this case indicates that no corrected Docketing Statement under FCR 47.6 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1026073] [GWK] [Entered: 08/19/2024 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Michael Renaud; Adam Rizk; Matthew A. Karambelas; and Nana Liu as counsel for Appellee DivX, LLC. Service: 07/26/2024 by email. [1020790] [24-2061] [Michael Renaud] [Entered: 07/26/2024 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, Docketing Statement [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/01/2024. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1020581] [IMH] [Entered: 07/25/2024 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee DivX, LLC, Entry of Appearance [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/01/2024. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1020575] [IMH] [Entered: 07/25/2024 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement for the Appellee DivX, LLC. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020435] [24-2061] [Michael Renaud] [Entered: 07/24/2024 09:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee DivX, LLC. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020434] [24-2061] [Michael Renaud] [Entered: 07/24/2024 09:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for Michael T. Renaud; Adam Rizk; Matthew A. Karambelas; and Nana Liu as counsel for Appellee DivX, LLC. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020433] [24-2061] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 9 ] [Michael Renaud] [Entered: 07/24/2024 09:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020423] [24-2061] [Theodore Angelis] [Entered: 07/24/2024 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020422] [24-2061] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 10 ] [Theodore Angelis] [Entered: 07/24/2024 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. Service: 07/24/2024 by email. [1020421] [24-2061] [Theodore Angelis] [Entered: 07/24/2024 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Theodore J. Angelis as counsel for Appellant Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. Service: 07/19/2024 by email. [1019068] [24-2061] [Theodore Angelis] [Entered: 07/19/2024 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 07/05/2024. [1016736] Entry of Appearance due 07/24/2024. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/24/2024. Docketing Statement due 07/24/2024. Appellant's brief is due 09/09/2024. [GWK] [Entered: 07/10/2024 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
