VidStream LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
Plaintiff: VIDSTREAM LLC
Defendant: TWITTER, INC.
Case Number: 24-2265
Filed: August 28, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 19, 2024 VIDSTREAM LLC v. TWITTER, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER filed denying [ # 10 ] motion to expedite briefing and argument; Briefing remains stayed pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 31(c). (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1033882] [NL] [Entered: 09/20/2024 03:50 PM]
September 18, 2024 Filing 18 REPLY of Appellant VidStream LLC to response [ # 15 ]. Service: 09/17/2024 by email. [1033155] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/18/2024 12:13 PM]
September 17, 2024 Filing 17 REPLY of Appellee Twitter, Inc. to response [ # 13 ]. Service: 09/17/2024 by email. [1032982] [24-2265] [Thomas Sprankling] [Entered: 09/17/2024 08:04 PM]
September 17, 2024 Filing 16 CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/17/2024 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1032778] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/17/2024 12:51 PM]
September 16, 2024 Filing 15 RESPONSE of Appellee Twitter, Inc. to Doc No. [ # 10 ], [ # 10 ], [ # 10 ]. Service: 09/16/2024 by email. [1032625] [24-2265] [Thomas Sprankling] [Entered: 09/16/2024 08:15 PM]
September 11, 2024 Filing 14 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Twitter, Inc.. Service: 09/11/2024 by email. [1031420] [24-2265] [Sonal Mehta] [Entered: 09/11/2024 01:11 PM]
September 10, 2024 Filing 13 RESPONSE of Appellant VidStream LLC to Doc No. [ # 5 ]. Service: 09/10/2024 by email. [1031263] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/10/2024 09:12 PM]
September 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Any opposition to the motion to expedite [ # 10 ] is due no later than September 16, 2024. Any reply in support of that motion is due no later than three days after service of the opposition. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1031102] [NL] [Entered: 09/10/2024 12:37 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1030975] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:25 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION of Appellant VidStream LLC to expedite briefing schedule, to expedite hearing, to expedite.. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. [1030974] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:24 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. [1030972] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:11 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 8 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. [1030971] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:09 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. [1030970] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:08 PM]
September 9, 2024 Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for Austin Curry; Jason D. Cassady; Bradley W. Caldwell; John F. Summers; Hamad M. Hamad as counsel for Appellant VidStream LLC. Service: 09/09/2024 by email. [1030969] [24-2265] [Austin Curry] [Entered: 09/09/2024 08:05 PM]
September 4, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION of Appellee Twitter, Inc. for summary affirmance. Cases to be terminated: 24-2265. (Briefing suspended pursuant to FCR 31 pending resolution of the motion).. Service: 09/04/2024 by email. [1029998] [24-2265] [Thomas Sprankling] [Entered: 09/04/2024 04:25 PM]
September 4, 2024 Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Twitter, Inc.. Service: 09/04/2024 by email. [1029962] [24-2265] [Sonal Mehta] [Entered: 09/04/2024 03:57 PM]
September 4, 2024 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Twitter, Inc.. Service: 09/04/2024 by email. [1029956] [24-2265] [Sonal Mehta] [Entered: 09/04/2024 03:52 PM]
September 4, 2024 Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Sonal N. Mehta; Thomas G. Sprankling as counsel for Appellee Twitter, Inc.. Service: 09/04/2024 by email. [1029940] [24-2265] [Sonal Mehta] [Entered: 09/04/2024 03:45 PM]
August 28, 2024 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 08/22/2024. [1028276] Entry of Appearance due 09/11/2024. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/11/2024. Docketing Statement due 09/11/2024. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 10/28/2024.--[Edited 08/28/2024 by KMH to correct deadlines] [KMH] [Entered: 08/28/2024 10:14 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: VidStream LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TWITTER, INC.
Represented By: Thomas Gregory Sprankling
Represented By: Sonal Naresh Mehta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VIDSTREAM LLC
Represented By: John Franklin Summers
Represented By: Hamad M. Hamad
Represented By: Jason Dodd Cassady
Represented By: Bradley Wayne Caldwell
Represented By: Austin Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?