TexasLDPC Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.
| TEXASLDPC INC. |
| BROADCOM INC., LSI CORPORATION and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC. |
| 25-1074 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ]. The opening brief is due 01/30/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1046574] [IMH] [Entered: 11/13/2024 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION of to extend the time to 01/30/2025 to file brief. Service: 11/12/2024 by email. [1046157] [25-1074] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 11/12/2024 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Frank E. Scherkenbach; David M. Hoffman; Warren K. Mabey, Jr.; John Thornburgh as counsel for Appellant TexasLDPC Inc.. Service: 11/05/2024 by email. [1044837] [25-1074] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 11/05/2024 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., LSI Corporation and Broadcom Inc.. Service: 11/04/2024 by email. [1044740] [25-1074] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 11/04/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., Broadcom Inc. and LSI Corporation, Docketing Statement [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/12/2024. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1044474] [CDL] [Entered: 11/04/2024 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant TexasLDPC Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/08/2024. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1044357] [CDL] [Entered: 11/01/2024 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellees Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., Broadcom Inc. and LSI Corporation. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1044052] [25-1074] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/31/2024 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement for the Appellees Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., Broadcom Inc. and LSI Corporation. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1044050] [25-1074] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 9 ] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/31/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Steven J. Rizzi; Ramy E. Hanna as counsel for Appellees Broadcom Inc., LSI Corporation and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc.. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1044048] [25-1074] [Steven Rizzi] [Entered: 10/31/2024 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellant TexasLDPC Inc.. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1043972] [25-1074] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 10/31/2024 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellant TexasLDPC Inc.. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1043970] [25-1074] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 10/31/2024 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Frank E. Scherkenbach; David M. Hoffman; Warren K. Mabey, Jr.; John Thornburgh as counsel for Appellant TexasLDPC Inc.. Service: 10/31/2024 by email. [1043969] [25-1074] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 8 ] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 10/31/2024 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/10/2024. [1040464] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/31/2024. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/31/2024. Docketing Statement is due on 10/31/2024. Appellant's brief is due on 12/16/2024. [IMH] [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
