Nguyen v. Corp. Of Catholic Archbishop
Plaintiff: HUONG THI NGUYEN
Defendant: CORP. OF CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, WILLIAM H.S. PRATT, RYAN MILLER, STEVEN PHILLIP PYLE and CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
Case Number: 25-1782
Filed: May 19, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Pers. Injury-Prod. Liab. (Fed. Qst.)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 11, 2025 NGUYEN v. CORP. OF CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Petition for writ of certiorari filed on 08/28/2025 in the U.S. Supreme Court. No.: 25-5988, Huong Thi Nguyen v. Corp. Of Catholic Archbishop. [1124755] [MVH] [Entered: 10/30/2025 03:49 PM]
October 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Service copy of document to U.S. Supreme Court for Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 10/30/2025 by clerk. [1124568] [MVH] [Entered: 10/30/2025 09:29 AM]
October 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Clerk's closed case letter to Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Further filings in this closed case will receive no response. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1118949] [MVH] [Entered: 10/02/2025 04:00 PM]
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Service copy of document to U.S. Supreme Court for Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 10/02/2025 by clerk. [1118948]. No action taken. See Doc. No. [ # 21 ] [MVH] [Entered: 10/02/2025 04:00 PM]
September 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1115185] [MVH] [Entered: 09/17/2025 11:29 AM]
August 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER filed dismissing appeal; denying [ # 11 ] motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Huong Thi Nguyen; Each party shall bear its own costs. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1107336] [NL] [Entered: 08/11/2025 10:33 AM]
August 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Paper document received from Huong Thi Nguyen. [1106784]--[Edited 08/11/2025 by GWK] [GWK] [Entered: 08/07/2025 12:18 PM]
July 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Paper document received from Huong Thi Nguyen. [1104893]--[Edited 08/11/2025 by GWK] [GWK] [Entered: 07/28/2025 03:09 PM]
July 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE of Not party Corp. Of Catholic Archbishop to Doc. No. [ # 10 ], [ # 10 ], [ # 10 ]. Service: 07/18/2025 by US mail, email. [1103160] [25-1782] [Colm Nelson] [Entered: 07/18/2025 12:42 PM]
July 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Entry of Appearance for Colm P. Nelson as counsel for Corp. of Catholic Archbishop. Service: 07/18/2025 by US mail, email. [1103155] [25-1782] [Colm Nelson] [Entered: 07/18/2025 12:23 PM]
July 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Paper document received from Huong Thi Nguyen. (PENDING REVIEW). [1100846] [GWK] [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:56 PM]
June 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE of Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen to Doc. No. [ # 10 ]. Service: 07/03/2025 by clerk. [1100168] [GWK] [Entered: 07/03/2025 03:02 PM]
June 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order, the parties are directed to address this court's jurisdiction, including whether the appeal should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Otherwise, the proceedings are stayed. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1095855] [NL] [Entered: 06/12/2025 11:23 AM]
June 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 06/13/2025 by clerk. [1096388] [GWK] [Entered: 06/13/2025 04:41 PM]
June 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice to Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen: The record of this case indicates that no docketing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under FCR 52 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1094282] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:45 PM]
June 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen, Reply Brief [ # 7 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1094277] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:42 PM]
June 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 06/05/2025 by clerk. [1094276] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:41 PM]
June 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 06/05/2025 by clerk. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1094275] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:40 PM]
June 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 06/05/2025 by clerk. [1094271] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:35 PM]
June 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance for Appellant Huong Thi Nguyen. Service: 06/05/2025 by clerk. [1094270] [GWK] [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:34 PM]
May 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Document from United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [1091072] [GWK] [Entered: 05/21/2025 12:23 PM]
May 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Paper document received from Huong Thi Nguyen. (PENDING REVIEW). [1091070] [GWK] [Entered: 05/21/2025 12:22 PM]
May 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/13/2025. [1090330] Fee/IFP due on 06/02/2025. Entry of Appearance due 06/02/2025. Appellant's brief is due 07/18/2025. [GWK] [Entered: 05/19/2025 09:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nguyen v. Corp. Of Catholic Archbishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HUONG THI NGUYEN
Represented By: Huong Thi Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORP. OF CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP
Represented By: Colm Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM H.S. PRATT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVEN PHILLIP PYLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?