Ligado Networks LLC v. US
Plaintiff: LIGADO NETWORKS LLC
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Amicus Curiae: DENNIS ROBERSON and USTELECOM--THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 25-1792
Filed: May 20, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Taking - Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 9, 2026 LIGADO NETWORKS LLC v. US
March 10, 2026 LIGADO NETWORKS LLC v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER filed granting the motion to expedite [ # 22 ] to the extent that this appeal shall be scheduled for the next available argument session after briefing is complete. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1127733] [LMS] [Entered: 11/13/2025 01:32 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 31 REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant US. Service: 11/10/2025 by email, US mail. (PENDING COMPLIANCE REVIEW) [1126986] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 11/10/2025 05:09 PM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 30 Certificate of Interest for Amicus Curiae Dennis Roberson. Service: 10/07/2025 by email, US mail. [1119674] [25-1792] [John Grimm] [Entered: 10/07/2025 12:12 PM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 29 Entry of Appearance for John Grimm as counsel for Amicus Curiae Dennis Roberson. Service: 10/07/2025 by email, US mail. [1119670] [25-1792] [John Grimm] [Entered: 10/07/2025 12:07 PM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 28 Certificate of Interest for Amicus Curiae USTelecom--The Broadband Association. Service: 10/07/2025 by email. [1119647] [25-1792] [Helgi Walker] [Entered: 10/07/2025 11:26 AM]
October 7, 2025 Filing 27 REMINDER : Amicus Curiae parties Dennis Roberson and USTelecom-The Broadband Association are reminded of their responsibility per Fed. Cir. R. 47.4(c) and Fed. Cir. R. 47.3 to promptly submit a Certificate of Interest (COI) and/or Entry of Appearance (EOA). Failure to comply with these Rules may delay the timely processing of your case or result in adverse action. [1119619] [JSP] [Entered: 10/07/2025 10:42 AM]
October 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 21 ] filed by Appellant US. The reply brief is due 11/10/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1119585] [LMS] [Entered: 10/07/2025 08:50 AM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 25 Entry of Appearance for Helgi C. Walker as counsel for USTelecom-The Broadband Association. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119566] [25-1792] [Helgi Walker] [Entered: 10/06/2025 08:17 PM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 24 MODIFIED ENTRY: AMICUS BRIEF FILED by USTelecom--The Broadband Association. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119565]--[Edited 10/07/2025 by JSP - compliance review complete] [Helgi Walker] [Entered: 10/06/2025 08:15 PM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 23 MODIFIED ENTRY: AMICUS BRIEF FILED by Dennis Roberson. Service: 10/06/2025 by email. [1119529]--[Edited 10/07/2025 by JSP - compliance review complete] [John Grimm] [Entered: 10/06/2025 05:08 PM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 22 MOTION of Appellee Ligado Networks LLC to expedite.. Service: 10/06/2025 by email, US mail. [1119419] [25-1792] [Donald Verrilli] [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:48 PM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 21 MOTION of Appellant US to extend the time to 11/10/2025 to file brief. Service: 10/02/2025 by email, US mail. [1118985] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 10/02/2025 08:23 PM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 20 MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 09/29/2025 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1118016] --[Edited 10/02/2025 by JSP - compliance review complete] [Ginger Anders] [Entered: 09/29/2025 05:43 PM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 19 Entry of Appearance for Kevin F. King as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 09/24/2025 by email. [1116871] [25-1792] [Kevin King] [Entered: 09/24/2025 12:59 PM]
August 27, 2025 Filing 18 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant US. Service: 08/27/2025 by email. [1111112] --[Edited 09/03/2025 by JSP - compliance review complete] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 08/27/2025 06:14 PM]
August 27, 2025 Filing 17 Notice of Correction to Doc No. [ # 15 ] for Appellant US. Service: 08/27/2025 by email, US mail. [1111111] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 08/27/2025 06:09 PM]
August 25, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant US, Opening Brief [ # 15 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 09/02/2025. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1110277] [JSP] [Entered: 08/25/2025 01:15 PM]
August 20, 2025 Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant US. Service: 08/20/2025 by email. [1109540] [25-1792] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 16 ] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 08/20/2025 07:09 PM]
July 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant US. The opening brief is due 08/20/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1102740] [LMS] [Entered: 07/16/2025 02:33 PM]
July 14, 2025 Filing 13 REPLY of Appellant US to response [ # 12 ]. Service: 07/14/2025 by email. [1102184] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 07/14/2025 04:15 PM]
July 9, 2025 Filing 12 RESPONSE of Appellee Ligado Networks LLC to Doc No. [ # 11 ]. Service: 07/09/2025 by email. [1101228] [25-1792] [Donald Verrilli] [Entered: 07/09/2025 06:04 PM]
July 3, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION of Appellant US to extend the time to 08/20/2025 to file brief. Service: 07/03/2025 by email. [1100102] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 07/03/2025 12:54 PM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellant US. Service: 06/20/2025 by email. [1097564] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 06/20/2025 01:34 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 9 Entry of Appearance for Harris Fischman as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/11/2025 by email. [1095587] [25-1792] [Harris Fischman] [Entered: 06/11/2025 11:17 AM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 8 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Martin Flumenbaum as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/10/2025 by email. [1095426] [25-1792] [Martin Flumenbaum] [Entered: 06/10/2025 06:23 PM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 7 Entry of Appearance for Martin Flumenbaum as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/10/2025 by email. [1095424] [25-1792] [Martin Flumenbaum] [Entered: 06/10/2025 06:12 PM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for Philippe Z. Selendy; Yelena Konanova; David A. Coon as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/10/2025 by email. [1095407] [25-1792] [Philippe Selendy] [Entered: 06/10/2025 05:02 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 5 Entry of Appearance for Nathanael B. Yale; Borislav Kushnir as counsel for Appellant US. Service: 06/03/2025 by email. [1093636] [25-1792] [Nathanael Yale] [Entered: 06/03/2025 12:30 PM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 4 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/03/2025 by email. [1093608] [25-1792] [Donald Verrilli] [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:30 AM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/03/2025 by email. [1093606] [25-1792] [Donald Verrilli] [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:29 AM]
June 3, 2025 Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Donald B. Verrilli, Jr.; Ginger D. Anders; Evan Mann as counsel for Appellee Ligado Networks LLC. Service: 06/03/2025 by email. [1093604] [25-1792] [Donald Verrilli] [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:28 AM]
May 20, 2025 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/20/2025. [1090760] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/03/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/03/2025. Docketing Statement is due on 06/20/2025. Appellant's brief is due on 07/21/2025. [JSP] [Entered: 05/20/2025 11:10 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ligado Networks LLC v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIGADO NETWORKS LLC
Represented By: Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
Represented By: Philippe Selendy
Represented By: Evan Jennings Mann
Represented By: Yelena Konanova
Represented By: Martin Flumenbaum
Represented By: Harris Fischman
Represented By: David Coon
Represented By: Ginger Anders
Represented By: Kevin F. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Nathanael Yale
Represented By: Borislav Kushnir
Represented By: Brett Shumate
Represented By: Patricia M. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: DENNIS ROBERSON
Represented By: John Grimm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: USTELECOM--THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Helgi C. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?