LG Electronics Inc. v. Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
| LG ELECTRONICS INC., LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. and VIZIO, INC. |
| MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD. |
| 25-1898 |
| July 1, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 19 ]. No further extensions should be anticipated. The response brief is due 02/20/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1131792] [IMH] [Entered: 12/02/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION of to extend the time to 02/18/2026 to file brief. Service: 12/02/2025 by email. [1131724] [25-1898] [Stephen Schreiner] [Entered: 12/02/2025 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 18 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc. Service: 11/10/2025 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [1127027] --[Edited 11/14/2025 by IMH - Reason: compliance review complete] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 11/10/2025 10:07 PM] |
| Filing 17 Corrected Entry of Appearance for James Carmichael; Stephen T. Schreiner; Minghui Yang as counsel for Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. Service: 10/20/2025 by email. [1122149] [25-1898] [Stephen Schreiner] [Entered: 10/20/2025 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd., Entry of Appearance [ # 15 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 10/24/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1121852] [IMH] [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 15 Entry of Appearance for James Carmichael; Stephen T. Schreiner; Minghui Yang as counsel for Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. Service: 10/16/2025 by email. [1121603] [25-1898] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 16 ] [Stephen Schreiner] [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 14 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellants LG Electronics USA, Inc., VIZIO, Inc. and LG Electronics Inc. The opening brief is due 11/10/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1115364] [IMH] [Entered: 09/18/2025 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION of Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc. to extend the time to 11/10/2025 to file brief. Service: 09/17/2025 by email. [1115346] [25-1898] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 09/17/2025 06:54 PM] |
| Filing 12 Note to File: The following cases shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel: 25-1898, -2039, and -2063. [1114307] [IMH] [Entered: 09/12/2025 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 11 Certified list received. Service: 08/11/2025 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [1108155] [IMH] [Entered: 08/14/2025 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. Service: 07/21/2025 by email. [1103566] [25-1898] [Timothy Gilman] [Entered: 07/21/2025 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. Service: 07/21/2025 by email. [1103562] [25-1898] [Timothy Gilman] [Entered: 07/21/2025 05:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. Service: 07/21/2025 by email. [1103560] [25-1898] [Timothy Gilman] [Entered: 07/21/2025 05:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 Entry of Appearance for Timothy K. Gilman; Robert S. Pickens as counsel for Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. Service: 07/21/2025 by email. [1103559] [25-1898] [Timothy Gilman] [Entered: 07/21/2025 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice to Appellee Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.: The record of this case indicates that no Entry of Appearance under FCR 47.3(b), Certificate of Interest under FCR 47.4, and Docketing Statement under FCR 47.6 has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1103183] [IMH] [Entered: 07/18/2025 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc.. Service: 07/15/2025 by email. [1102499] [25-1898] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 07/15/2025 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc.. Service: 07/15/2025 by email. [1102498] [25-1898] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 07/15/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc.. Service: 07/15/2025 by email. [1102496] [25-1898] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 07/15/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Debra J. McComas; David L. McCombs; Gregory P. Huh; Angela M. Oliver; Laura N. Vu as counsel for Appellants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. and VIZIO, Inc.. Service: 07/15/2025 by email. [1102493] [25-1898] [Debra McComas] [Entered: 07/15/2025 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 06/30/2025. [1099596] Entry of Appearance is due on 07/15/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/15/2025. Docketing Statement is due on 07/15/2025. Certified List is due on 08/11/2025. [IMH] [Entered: 07/01/2025 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
