Motion Offense, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
| MOTION OFFENSE, LLC |
| DROPBOX, INC. |
| 25-2083 |
| September 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Certified list received. Service: 10/15/2025 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [1121847] [25-2068, 25-2083] [IMH] [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Motion Offense, LLC. Service: 09/19/2025 by email. [1115718] [25-2083] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 09/19/2025 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Motion Offense, LLC. Service: 09/19/2025 by email. [1115715] [25-2083] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 09/19/2025 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of Appearance for Derek Dahlgren as counsel for Appellant Motion Offense, LLC. Service: 09/19/2025 by email. [1115711] [25-2083] [Derek Dahlgren] [Entered: 09/19/2025 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 25-2068 Lead with 25-2083 Member Case. The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1115290] [25-2068, 25-2083] [IMH] [Entered: 09/17/2025 03:38 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER consolidating appeals (25-2068 and 25-2083). The Certified Lists are due no later than 10/15/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1115289] [25-2068, 25-2083] [IMH] [Entered: 09/17/2025 03:37 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Dropbox, Inc.. Service: 09/09/2025 by email. [1113626] [25-2083] [Gregory Lantier] [Entered: 09/09/2025 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Dropbox, Inc.. Service: 09/09/2025 by email. [1113624] [25-2083] [Gregory Lantier] [Entered: 09/09/2025 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Dropbox, Inc.. Service: 09/09/2025 by email. [1113623] [25-2083] [Gregory Lantier] [Entered: 09/09/2025 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Gregory H. Lantier; Todd C. Zubler; Amanda L. Major; Daniel V. Williams; Liv L. Herriot as counsel for Appellee Dropbox, Inc.. Service: 09/09/2025 by email. [1113622] [25-2083] [Gregory Lantier] [Entered: 09/09/2025 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/02/2025. [1112870] Entry of Appearance due 09/19/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 09/19/2025. Docketing Statement due 09/19/2025. Certified List due on 10/15/2025. [MMA] [Entered: 09/05/2025 04:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Motion Offense, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: MOTION OFFENSE, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Derek Dahlgren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: DROPBOX, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Todd Zubler |
| Represented By: | Daniel V. Williams |
| Represented By: | Amanda L. Major Esq. |
| Represented By: | Liv Leila Herriot |
| Represented By: | Gregory H. Lantier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
